First you have to have a physical flashlight (torch) in your hands.
Then we can discuss the niceties.
But, so far, this one is theoretical (but I can see how it might just work, in the best possible case, it’s not complicated).
Meanwhile, in the absence of any communication from the principals, let’s just keep slagging each other off, if that’s what amuses you. Nothing to do with me, or you, we are just observers. Nor some connectedness with the “project”.
It fills a space, I suppose. Or is just vacuous. But contributes nothing.
I don’t think anyone can say “That didn’t take too long to create” about the Fireflies products. It may APPEAR as if they simply pop up out of thin air, but the fact is they have been working on them for many many months. Much longer than any of us actually realize. We are not privy to all the “behind the scenes” drama involved in designing, prototyping, testing, tweaking, revisions, etc… of the Fireflies line of lights. The same goes for Emisar.
About the special edition thing, I’ve been really tempted to change the thread title. I’ve always thought The Miller’s title was a little awkward. Special elegant triple powerful flashlight. Should probably change that at some point.
Funny you should ask, I was just thinking about that.
IMHO the answer is yes.
HDS, Novatac, Liteflux and maybe others have tackled this issue, some more successfully than others.
Again, IMHO HDS has done it best.
I don’t know if there are patent issues regarding that particular design but I’m hoping this version works.
The current carried to the switch is tiny so a much smaller conductor could be used.
A notch down the inside of the battery tube could house the insulated conductor.
It’s a matter of making it robust enough to handle battery changes and curious owners.