Fireflies E07 preview

Well its many drawbacks. We cant deny that. I find it strange that a company like Nitecore would try to cheat like that…

Biggest drawback is you cant bring spare battery with you for longer trips, also the fact that a battery have limited amount of charging cycles is a problem in long term use, battery will perform less and less good with time, in future I would think you can get some kind of health rating for the battery some how, just like you can with your smartphone.

One solution would be that for instance a company would have a certain body/tube design with internal battery, which will fit more then one model, and also you can buy spare one, its like a “power bank”, so if you buy a flashlight you might only need the head, if you already have a compatible tube with internal battery. I think this kind of modular design would open up for opportunities that each individual could design what size and power he or she need, if you need more power you can buy a bigger tube. This solution would take away most of the drawbacks of internal batteries, since you can buy new and replace and also bring spare if you need.

I think it’s a cool idea with this modular design that would maximize battery capacity to size ratio, also bring flexibility to the user if he/she prefer more power or smaller size.

I think the sooner the flashlight industry realize that internal batteries is the future the better, it would give a lot more juice. Smartphone industry have realized this long time ago, this is why replaceable batteries never ever will come back to smartphones, because replaceable batteries need a protection shell which have big impact on capacity, we are in the same dilemma with flashlights. So I hope there will become some kind of standard with battery packs for flashlight so they will fit, or atleast that they work with the same brand.

I think even if we like it or not built in charger will become standard soon. its a deal breaker for many, especially NON flashholic nerds, its a lot more easy.
Drawbacks are too small to justify to not include built in charger. Only the real hardcore nerds with the most expensive and fancy lcd screens charger will complain. Most people just want to plug in the cable and let it charge, a lot more easy then have to unscrew the tube and take out the battery every time.

Ah, we’re in a different realm here compared to other portable devices.

Cylindrical cells here will always be the norm due to how they are made.

If you were to make a flashlight with a pouch cell that had the same internal volume as a cylindrical cell, you’d actually get more capacity with the cylindrical cells.

Why do you think Tesla is using cylindrical cells? Because having, even slightly, higher energy density per mass and volume is what matters.

This is why flashlights should always have replaceable cells, since using a different design wouldn’t actually be useful at all.
You wouldn’t get any more juice, and you’d lose on the easy replacement, easy to repair cells.
Also, what do you think happens when proprietary battery packs are implemented? Higher costs to the user.
What happens if a flashlight battery pack is discontinued? You can’t replace a battery pack that would otherwise have less life than the light itself.

My thoughts, yours may be different.

As long as USB charging is limited to little key chain lights, some headlamps, & options on a few ‘novice friendly’ lights; I don’ mind at all as long as the USB port is in the threads… hidden & protected by a tail or some other threaded cap.
Rubber plugs, no matter how good they seem at first are not a good long term solution.

I could care less if it be USB Micro or C. Seems to me Micro makes more sense in a small light

I am totally & completely against USB charging in High power Li Ion lights be they single cell or multi cell. The reasons for this are many, ranging from safety, to unwanted size increase, and anything in between. A high powered Li Ion light does not need USB charging.

As far as a “built in battery”, proprietary most likely; in a High Powered light: Absolutely NOT. I will not even go into my reasoning on this one, it would take to long. :person_facepalming:
But I personally would never own one.
The only exception being very small keychain lights.

Do you dare to charge your smartphone ?
Your smartphone battery is a big bomb also.

Why would cylindrical have more capacity ?
It does not seem logical too me and also you need stronger protection shell. I do not care of what form the battery have, it should have the same as the body of the flashlight if its cylindrical then you have cylindrical battery, but internal battery would mean you do need as strong protective shell because its protected by the flashlight body just like with smartphone batteries, they have no metallic protection layer anymore as they had before when you could replace them, similiar principle should work with flashlights.

Why tesla use regular batteries I do not know, cost is one for sure, probably higher yields on smaller batteries rather then bigger maybe…But to be honest I have no idea

That’s precisely because of the shell and the shape.

1. The cylindrical shape and fitting allows to fit more active material in, meaning higher energy density.

2. The steel casing allows for a much safer design compared to pouch cells.
Try puncturing a steel cased 18650/aluminium cased 21700. Not easy. A pouch cell can easily be penetrated by almost anything.

Yep, I charge it. You charge yours?

I never mentioned “big bomb”. Is that what you consider your ‘smart phone’ to be?

If so how do you deal with that? Looks like it would be tough mentally to carry it <span class=“bomb” big “a”> around with you… if you do carry it that is.

edit for spelling correction.

The FW3A team rejected support for protected cells because they decided that the extra 5 mm would be too much. And with this the rejected cells that have built-in chargers or powerbanks. So…5 mm clearly matters to some. That said for larger lights the size increase could be as low as 0. F.e. D4 could easily go with a larger diameter driver, that may be enough to add a charger. If not - going to double sided driver would be enough for sure. So I’m pretty confident that Emisar could pull it off with 0 size increase.

For me those are the main drawbacks and an absolute no go for built-in.

You are seeing this with a end-user point of view. Why would a manufacturer do this ?
Did you ever compare prices for proprietary replaceable rectangular battery for GoPro, Panasonic compact camera, etc ? They are way overpriced.
They are not built-in yet but you have to recharge it with the device’s built-in charger. You can buy an optionnal external charger but generally it is also overpriced.
All manufacturers know that it is better to have a proprietary format because people will have to buy it from them. Exclusivity = higher prices.
They also know that changing format regularly (but not to often) will force people to renew their stuff.

I’m using flashlights that are 10 years old.
I would hate to have to consider sending back a flashlight to china or usa for a built-in battery replacement and to hear that they no longer manufacturing this particular format.
They are running businesses and the general business plan have changed, durability is dead since long. They won’t make choices favorable to the end-user. Modularity isn’t in their plan. Proprietary is, and also forcing people to renew their stuff by a way or another.

If you want to be tightened to a manufacturer wills, built-in is the future, the jam on their bread and butter.

Sorry if I sound :

Nothing to be sorry for Tally-ho, I agree.

If flashlights ever only have proprietary batteries with USB Charging… I personally will be done with buying new flashlights. :wink:

…so which one did you end up getting?

Well I would of course prefer a open standard so it works cross-brands so I can use nitecore battery module together with a astrolux flashlight for instance.
Even if it goes proprietary you might save money anyway since you only need to buy a new “head” when you upgrade flashlight.

Well I guess we will have to wait and see… of this will become a thing yet, so far nitecore TM10K is the only flashlight with non replaceable battery that I know of .But I read now it has a normal 21700 cell. anyway They claim they get more power out of it of having it irreplaceable.

@Ekstasis, what Nitecore is saying is absolute crap.

Not only is the Samsung 48G 21700 a 10A cell in a 30A light, meaning they cut costs, but the 30mOhm contact thing is quite crap.

There have been sub 10mOhm springs for a while now. They just wanted to justify putting a non replaceable incapable cell inside of a flashlight for cost-cutting and profit making.

The 40T wasn’t out yet when they made they made the TM10T. This is the problem with irreplaceable cells. The P42A cell that was recently released would have been perfect for this light.

People are not dumb and don’t mind built-in battery for devices below 40$ but when they are seeking durability for devices that are above 100$, generally people are thinking twice before buying it. For someone who is following the e-cigarettes trend, it’s all the more obvious. Things/trends are moving faster than on the flashlight market. There is a bunch of small and med size devices with built-in battery but most generally with a much lower price than bigger, more powerfull devices with built-in batteries, which are rarer.
Removable 18650/21700 battery’s devices are plethoric.

Nitecore could have weld (tab) this new battery in a sealed flashlight. Why didn’t they ? Probably because of complains from enthousiasts about the previous version or because they know that a built-in battery for devices with a significant price is still “shooting a bullet in the foot” when competitors don’t generalize it also.

EDIT : Sorry, I pictured it differently in my mind and thought you were saying that the new one will work with a removable battery.

i thought gold doesn’t oxidize. why not use it?

That’s not the problem.

Trying to push 30A through springs is a very, very difficult task.

Honestly, I have to say Nitecore was both lazy, greedy, and impatient in this regard.

Why? While they are right in regards that the springs would oxidize, they didn’t tell why

Well, at 30A, any normal spring would melt pretty much instantly.

Here’s the thought process Nitecore probably had:

1. Let’s use gold plated steel springs. Oh no, they failed at 6A.
2. Let’s use gold plated dual steel springs. Oh no, they failed at 9A.
2. Let’s use dual phosphor bronze springs. Oh no again, they failed at 18A of continuous use.
4. Well, nothing on the market actually exists that can handle the load of a 100-120W light running off of a single cell.
Let’s put a 10A cell in a 30A flashlight and weld nickel plated copper strips instead.

If the engineers, or rather, Nitecore, actually put in effort into designing adequate contacts, they should’ve just looked at BLF and see what members cooked up in spring design.

They could’ve used dual gold plated BeCu C17500 springs, and they would’ve worked quite well if they had waited for a 25-30A cell.

um, yeah. that’s what i said…the good thing is now i know why i said it. i can’t believe the wealth of info you guys have trapped in your minds…