WTB: Jetbeam RRT01 – Any place to buy it?! + [RRT01 2019 discussion]

Looks like definitive proof Clemence.

I haven’t opened my 2019 RRT-01 to compare the driver to the old RRT-01’s, but I suspect they are probably the same design, but with a bit more current going through.

Back when the original RRT-01 was released, outputs were a lot lower and temp sensors on flashlights were rare. Today, outputs are higher and temp sensors are more common.

It sounds like the driver simply hasn’t been updated with a temp sensor or low voltage protection. That’s too bad.

It’s still a great light though, but just be aware when you use it that this one is lacking some of the safety features found in other lights.

It doesn’t have LVP because it designed to also work with CR123. Protected 18350/16340 and temporary max mode are mandatory for this RRT01.

[Clemence]

I don’t think a protected cell is mandatory.

Just don’t overuse the light or leave it tailstanding.

I mean for safety measures. Keeps out of reach of children too

definitely!

For Children, a High CRI HDS is safer than an RRT-01, because
HDS are not 18350 compatible,
are limited to 200 lumens,
have a 33% auto step down at 40 seconds,
and auto shut off at 3.0v

.

Preposterous Proposition Warning:
A resident of the State of California has determined that the RRT-01 is not suitable for children.
Responsible use of 18350 LiIon flamethrowers requires an “intelligent” adult operator.

I don’t think I’d want to hand a child a nearly $300 HDS flashlight either.

Safe for the child maybe. Safe for my wallet no!!!

Child can make do with a $3 light from the local store.

No high powered flashlight is safe for a child. All they need to do is point it at their eyes and try to brave the light… leading to retinal damage.

For anyone interested, here is my review of the RRT01

outstanding review, thanks for the great photos too

and now Ti ala CRX

Laissez les bons temps rouler!

Differences in the Original RRT-01 and the New Version with Brass pill.

  1. The brass pill makes the New Version 1 ounce heavier and 1/8” fatter.

2. No strobe on Original RRT-01. Yes Strobe on New Version.
3. New Version pocket clip is long, past the control ring. Some Originals got short clips, and they can still be bought.

4. New Version is set for higher max power draw.
5. New Version fits 19mm Carclo without modification to the diameter of the optic. Original requires customizing the optic’s diameter.
New Version RRT-01:

Original Version RRT-01:

6. New Version is XP-L, Original is XM-L. They have different reflectors, the Original has rings in the spill beam.

Original RRT-01 / TCR-01 did not require any modification to the Carclo optic to make it a triple. The optic fits perfectly. However, the edges of the star do require a little filing down.

Are you sure about that?

I stand corrected.

Based on that photo I opened up my TCR-01 triple to double-check the optic. Looks like I did modify the optic after all so that it would fit.

However the modification to the optic was extremely simple. All I did was file down about 1/4 to 1/3 of the outside of each of the 3 legs. Basically 5 minutes with a small handfile. None of the rest of the optic needed modification… just the legs.

Yeh, that sounds about right :beer:

I wasn’t sure if maybe the rrt-01 or the optic might’ve changed slightly.

Just found this one:
https://skylumen.com/collections/one-off/products/one-off-rrt01vn-triple-quad-rustic-editions

Why did he scratched them like this ? It’s ugly no ? :confounded:
Mine now rocks a 219B and an OP reflector from an Eagle Eye X2R.
I had to grind the outer diameter of the reflector by about 1mm.
I removed the stock centering gasket to allow a better focus, but the beam is not that good…
I might try with a 219C, the old 219B is too cold (I think it’s 5700K)

Triple 219B 4500°K…
…150$

Where???

@id30209, check your link >> options >> TRIPLE 219B 4500K

OMG! There was only W2 option when i saw it this morning!!!
Thx for opening my eyes bro!