*BLF LT1 Lantern Project) (updated Nov,17,2020)

Please add me to the list for one.
Thanks.

Its trickier for measuring 360-degree lanterns versus directional flashlights no doubt, but will be comparing it tot its self with globe/shade on versus off, as compared to the V1 & V2 tests i done.

I think he means not relative numbers, but absolute numbers for the manufacturer?

Sign me up for one, please!

Interested in one too, and it would be nice to have the option to order one of these fantastic looking lanterns with a case but without batteries: I have plenty of 18650’s already……

Did I mention I think it’s looking fantastic?

Regarding the logo choice I’m with Djozz, the other one has letters that are to thick for my liking.

Thanks for all the efforts and cheers,

Nico

Aah what the heck. There’s nothing wrong with my bedside lamp, but this is a lot cooler.

Put me down for one, please. :slight_smile:

I would like to be on the list!

Put me in for 1 please!

No, I do mean relative numbers too. Even small black things inside integrating spheres affect the amount of integration noticably, and a huge black thing like the BLF Lantern inside a relatively small sphere will effectively kill useful integration of the light output. (no good integration means that what we measure is not total light output, and comparisons can only be made with light sources with the exact same beam. While a different beam is what you want to compare here) It will be a little better than just leaving the sphere out of the setup and just position a luxmeter next to the lantern, but not much better than that. Making the lantern shiny (or even better matt white) enormously improves integration so that your measurement actually somewhat represents total light output and so you can make comparisons. Btw, also baffling the detector against direct light from the lantern would make integration better.

It is not that I want to wish to come over as some know-all, but measuring light comes with some pretty annoying rules and in theory design decisions could be off because they are based on too rough comparisons, and that would be unfortunate.

Is the accessory kit still looking to be released after the latern?

Please add 2 more to my list. Total 7

As planned yes, as i have to know the characteristics, dimensions, and abilities of the production model first for some of the accessories. The various accessories will likely include, or variations of,

- a brim-type upper reflector.

- a side directional reflector.

- soft padded carry bag.

- 12 to 15-foot charging cable, (heavier gauge wire)

- high capacity 3500 or 3600mah cells.

- a snap on wide base for uneven surfaces.

- a thread in powerful base magnet.

- a hard case to fit most accessories & the lantern.

  • Wall hanging adapter bracket

Other possible matching accessories may be added, including,

- 10-watt or 12 watt folding solar charger panel

  • multi-voltage charger power adapter, (12 volt DC, 120 volt AC, 240 volt AC)

Some of the accessories i am already working on with testing on the two prototypes i have.

I’m interested in one, please add me to the list!

Isn’t it An idea tot put the auto tint in the muggle mode. This way even a muggle can use the warm and cool feature of this light.

I’ve gotten quite a few Sofirn batteries, and they seem to be decent. Other people have also posted about their experiences:

I dunno guys. I’m having second thoughts.

I was doing some beamshots and — I can’t quite figure out why, but… something doesn’t look right.

It looks like it might be broken. Everything I point it at gets darker.

Are you sure you want this thing?

I’m interested put me down on the list

lol :smiley: That doughnut hole is perfect! that photo proves the degree of light distribution is close to that of the V2 prototype i built.

Looks fantastic! Please add me to the list.

Yeah, that beam has a big hole in it! Almost like someone put a big black puck on a Q8 lens!

Maybe its SOOO bright that it reads black like when you video record directly at the sun?
lol