FREEME ✌ ASTROLUX FT03S SBT90.2 4500lm 1428m 26650/ 21700/ 18650 Flashlight - EXPIRED

Cloud · November 22, 2019, 6:02am

I don’t think it will heat up that fast, the head is quite large. The handle is long, and hoping for a better beam profile than the NI40, similar to the current ft03 with XHP50.2

hasddie293 · November 22, 2019, 8:39am

Aaah…before I forget, this sbt 90.2 beast only consume high drain battery rate 20amp rather than mid drain battery. You tell me, where are the high drain battery you’ll get from?? Its in “21700” category only, e.g 40T, p42a, vtc6,.

So, my point is that…why would we build a “26650” host FT03 where I think 26650 is still in the mid drain category? Even 21700, single of it gonna drain like crazy? I thought is that, we need a specialize high drain battery host just about enough amp for the sbt 90.2 to function properly.

So,
● single 21700 high drain cell, enough power(or not) but short of capacity(it will short live boring)

● single 26650, short of amp but longer capacity(less lumen than advertised)

Option(probably) ● triple(or quad?) cell host design not sure specific 21700 or 18650, ofcourse in parallel connection. With this, gonna give the sbt90.2 suitable amp draw.

So what do guy think? Take a look deep at the Lux perpetua project and I must been thinking, he has probably more true about sbt 90.2. Here link

Streamtronics · November 22, 2019, 10:29am

Interested

jonxxn · November 22, 2019, 1:06pm

Interested

Sergey_1998 · November 22, 2019, 1:36pm

I am interesed!

rizky_p · November 22, 2019, 1:39pm

Interested.

light_man89 · November 22, 2019, 2:02pm

interested

I_SpY · November 22, 2019, 3:51pm

Interested.

Chinaheart · November 22, 2019, 4:19pm

interested

FlashIight · November 22, 2019, 4:39pm

Interested!

California_Prepper · November 22, 2019, 11:32pm

hasddie293:

Aaah…before I forget, this sbt 90.2 beast only consume high drain battery rate 20amp rather than mid drain battery. You tell me, where are the high drain battery you’ll get from?? Its in “21700” category only, e.g 40T, p42a, vtc6,.

So, my point is that…why would we build a “26650” host FT03 where I think 26650 is still in the mid drain category? Even 21700, single of it gonna drain like crazy? I thought is that, we need a specialize high drain battery host just about enough amp for the sbt 90.2 to function properly.

So,
● single 21700 high drain cell, enough power(or not) but short of capacity(it will short live boring)

● single 26650, short of amp but longer capacity(less lumen than advertised)

Option(probably) ● triple(or quad?) cell host design not sure specific 21700 or 18650, ofcourse in parallel connection. With this, gonna give the sbt90.2 suitable amp draw.

So what do guy think? Take a look deep at the Lux perpetua project and I must been thinking, he has probably more true about sbt 90.2. Here link

Wouldn’t a 26650 high output Golisi do just fine?

mikeyx · November 23, 2019, 12:23am

Interested.

Thanks,
Mike

Th558 · November 23, 2019, 5:03pm

You can use a 21700 in this light. I would use a 2mm copper ring just to be safe though.

Edit: just tried one ring…it works but 2mm is a bit much for this light. Maybe 1mm will be better.

Annfirst · November 23, 2019, 7:22am

Inteeested

piotrek966 · November 23, 2019, 8:11am

Interseted

takumi86 · November 23, 2019, 8:13am

interested as well!

Kennyboy · November 23, 2019, 9:39am

Interested depending on price

kether · November 23, 2019, 9:59am

interested

TheBigLEDowski · November 23, 2019, 5:00pm

Interested.

Cloud · November 23, 2019, 5:35pm

May I ask a stupid question: it probably is very stupid cuz if it wasn’t someone would have asked it already. I am sure this new ft03 will be an amazing throwy light and I will buy it gladly but it will still have a huge ft03 head / large size which will be its main drawback. Why not put the SBT90.2 emitter into a thrunite catapult v6 instead. As is it out throws ft03, so I presume with a new emitter, same reflector, it will outgrow the new fr03 too . Yes I get it it will heat up faster due to smaller head/mass but I am sure many will agree to deal with shorter turbo times in exchange for an attractive small size and a super long throw. Or a v6 clone from mhvast instead? (forgot the model name) .

Is the answer the cost of v6? Or some legal difficulties, thrunite not agreeing to sell their modified lights?

Or is it that after we all buy the new modified ft03, next week, the modified catapult 6 group buy will be announced so they we will be spending more of our money on the same ( fubclionally) thing? I honestly and sincerely asking as I don’t know the answer. Can someone shed light? ( pun intended)
Thanks