That’s correct, I’m using the lantern as is. I don’t have a way of measuring lumens only relative output so the immediate light output measurement when the lantern is turned on in high mode is what I use as the baseline of 600 lumens in the chart.
remove the base, connect one of the driver mounting screws to the non anodize part of the base, put a DVM set to measure current between the battery ring and one of the cells in the base.
I guess I got a better connection this time and got 1.9A.
Hard to tell from the image but NW 6&7 might be bridged. Some of the early LT’s were incorrectly soldered so all 7 7135’s were enabled. If they are soldered check with your DMM to see if they are bridged or not.
Switch to the ohms (resistance) on the dial. Get the leads to touch each side of the 6/7 pads. If it’s low then they might be bridge, if it’s fairly high or out of range then they’re not bridged.
Yes! I’m going to first figure out if the other output drivers are enabled for my lantern then will do more runtime tests for the default levels in step mode.
Well I did another test of my LT1, using the current measuring method of GreenCampfire above. With 5 channels enabled, I measure 2.2 A on my meter with neutral tint mixing (factory reset) using a 30Q, and 1.6A using a sofirn 2200mAhr battery. Both are button tops. Interesting the Sofirn cell is not really delivering. With my laptop pull cell I get 2.06A. The sofirn cell is near 3.6V, The 30Q is at 3.8V, and the laptop at 3.9V. Guessing that cell impedance somehow factors into current draw, even with the 7135s limiting the current? I don’t really get it, unless the voltage is drooping enough that the 7135s are not really limiting the laptop pull and Sofirn cell.
More experiments to follow, including a run test with 4 ~3000mAhr cells I have that I’m topping off right now.
Check left half moon of 6 and right half moon of 6. I’m too lazy to open paint and make a picture. Then repeat for 7. Sorry was not clear earlier. But from that close up picture does not look like they are bridged together, so you should get a pretty high reading.
I would expect that one side of pad 6 and one side of pad 7 would be connected. What was suggested (not clearly enough) is to measure the resistance between the two adjacent pads labeled 6, the two adjacent pads labeled 7, for both WW and NW. Zooming in on the picture, I would think they are not shorted together.
The recent measurements I made suggest that the pads are not connected, but somehow there is more current demand from the batteries than expected. I made some measurements in my previous post with a few different cells. I with my 30Q cells, I got numbers close to you. with other cells the readings were a bit lower.
I meant to change the tint to all one or the other direction, will check that out when I pause my current run test later this evening. The current changing with tint was an observation made in the early versions of tint mixing firmware, but I thought that had been addressed.
Welcome to BLF GreenCampfire! Awesome test with graph too That is about what i got on the production model with the 3000mah cells running it on maximum is between the 5 to 5.5 hours non stop. I usually run it on a mode or two down, (75 to 80%) and seems to nearly triple the run times, but i don’t remember if it was on the 3000 mAh , 3200mAh or 3500 mAh cells i was testing at the tome for that lower mode running.
I’m not sure if GreenCamper and I both have DVMs that measure high, or if there is some sort of change between the prototypes and the production units in terms of current draw. The video from Lexel below shows the early phenomenon with the tint ramping. In this case, the current during the “mixed” tints is lower than either end.
The measurements in this thread approach that of Lexel’s, but with only 5 of the 7 channels enabled. Are the 7135s wacky? or is there some other loss happening? 5x0.35A=1.75A, not 2.2 or 2.4 like we are measuring now.