Its a 5498 cell, 10x the energy of a 21700. Floats in antifreeze to warm and cool cell.
One of these cells in the blf-lt1 would give a 2 month runtime.
They have 10x a 21700 energy. Tesla will use battery pack 1/10th the current size. How is that terrible density? Not understanding ?
It has a catalyst electrode and drops into a pack. Levels of magnitude better then 21700. New teslas built with this 5498 cell will cost msrp 29k and have 300+ mile range.
I will buy one and charge with my solar array and drive for free.
It seems that the number 54 comes from “FX054” marking on the can, that sounds like a very wild guess if you ask me, granted it looks bigger than 40700 unless those are small hands.
[quote=idahofarmer]
They have 10x a 21700 energy. Tesla will use battery pack 1/10th the current size. How is that terrible density? [/Quote]
I don’t think the pack is going to be 1/10 the volume. There will likely be some packing efficiency improvements with the larger cell, but overall volume should remain similar. A 10x reduction in volume would require other worldly improvements in active material specific energy.
The point for them is $$ first. Fewer cells in an architecture with shared components will save time and money in production. I’m not qualified to even guess how much that may be, but I can say pretty confidently the energy density of the cell is not 10x current values.
I guess we will know possibly next week, here is another video posted just 16 hours ago. Talk about massive runtime capabilities in a flashlight! This would be a game changer in the flashlight world!