Your reviews are awesome! Any recommendation on a warm headlamp? I wear my Nitecore around the house (wife thinks it looks stupid) and use the red LED at night but the white is 6500K.
Kindle, should we accept a fallacy, because it has been officially accepted as “a norm”?
Of course not.
In fact, many people would like to further the discussion regarding this “little economic issue”, but some others like you and Harrier seems to prevent that process.
There is 2 camps since the beginning of that “viral affair” :
- A majority who bear the consequences of that psychologic and economic terror, and those (a minority and their employee$) who defend the official “figures” because they make a huge amount of money from it.
The sentence written by Harrier represents the quintessence of grammatical/semantic nonsense (gross BS)
_
_
Therefore (following that linguistic approach)
_
_
_
_
Et caetera, et caetera…
If = supposition,
By definition, a supposition is the opposite of any form of exactitude (fact, truth, or whatever term corresponding to that meaning)
But here we are :
- The new norm, is not just a “isolate modification regarding sanitary issues” Nope.
What is called “new norm, is in fact a global paradigm switch.
Those who sell drugs (and associates), need, faithful consumers. Good obedient clients. No more common sense, no more logic, just dazed and confused online consumers…
Let’s just put aside the floating figures that scientifically correspond to nothing else than market analysis fluctuations.
The new norm wants the People to believe in anything, even though it is totally illogical, ridiculous or worse, hazardous for their future, IT HAS TO BE ACCEPTED AS THE TRUTH.
Well, you are free to believe in commercial bs, it’s your choice. Go ahead, you are “free”
On my side (and many other members on this forum and in the real world) dare to observe and think. Thinking is the basement of any scientific approach, and WE > FLASHLIGHT LOVERS enjoy logical and practical thinking !
Oh, and yeah, freedom of speech find its way through humor and satiric matter :
The only thing that matters is data. Again, you’ve not provided any. You’ve made claims about what others believe but offered nothing in the way of supporting evidence.
I don’t particularly care where individuals stand in regards to the topic. Posters with very different points of views have been able to discuss the issue amicably. You’ve chosen not to participate in a civil manner. Passive aggressive digs only hurt the conversation.
Unfortunately, by now I’m accustomed to being attacked for making simple statements of fact - even statements that can’t be disputed, like stating that it is indisputable that official statistics exist. We live in an age where people are either paid, or politically motivated, to anonymously make false statements about what other people say and hurl insults with the purpose of confusing others about the facts, or distracting them from the facts.
I’m not going to directly respond to the latest ad hominem attack on me, above, other than to thank the forum members who pointed out that I didn’t make any statements suggesting that the official figures are correct or incorrect, and that falsely accusing other members of making such statements for a nefarious purpose, or through dishonest means, is not appropriate and not what this forum, or this thread, are about.