Casting aspersions from the sidelines doesn’t further the discussion.
If you feel you have something valuable & verifiable to add please feel free to share it.
On a different note, did you know that toilet seat covers do nothing for you?
Kindle, should we accept a fallacy, because it has been officially accepted as “a norm”?
Of course not.
In fact, many people would like to further the discussion regarding this “little economic issue”, but some others like you and Harrier seems to prevent that process.
There is 2 camps since the beginning of that “viral affair” :
- A majority who bear the consequences of that psychologic and economic terror, and those (a minority and their employee$) who defend the official “figures” because they make a huge amount of money from it.
The sentence written by Harrier represents the quintessence of grammatical/semantic nonsense (gross BS)
_
_
Therefore (following that linguistic approach)
_
_
_
_
Et caetera, et caetera…
If = supposition,
By definition, a supposition is the opposite of any form of exactitude (fact, truth, or whatever term corresponding to that meaning)
But here we are :
- The new norm, is not just a “isolate modification regarding sanitary issues” Nope.
What is called “new norm, is in fact a global paradigm switch.
Those who sell drugs (and associates), need, faithful consumers. Good obedient clients. No more common sense, no more logic, just dazed and confused online consumers…
Let’s just put aside the floating figures that scientifically correspond to nothing else than market analysis fluctuations.
The new norm wants the People to believe in anything, even though it is totally illogical, ridiculous or worse, hazardous for their future, IT HAS TO BE ACCEPTED AS THE TRUTH.
Well, you are free to believe in commercial bs, it’s your choice. Go ahead, you are “free”
On my side (and many other members on this forum and in the real world) dare to observe and think. Thinking is the basement of any scientific approach, and WE > FLASHLIGHT LOVERS 
enjoy logical and practical thinking !
Oh, and yeah, freedom of speech find its way through humor and satiric matter :
Because they are not paid for that (and others are simply too afraid to loose their account to defend their point of view)
Goebbels would have loved that cartoonist.
Never thought I’d see so much hate on BLF.
Please > No politics here.
The only thing that matters is data. Again, you’ve not provided any. You’ve made claims about what others believe but offered nothing in the way of supporting evidence.
I don’t particularly care where individuals stand in regards to the topic. Posters with very different points of views have been able to discuss the issue amicably. You’ve chosen not to participate in a civil manner. Passive aggressive digs only hurt the conversation.
Data? Well, data have, without exception, never fallen from the sky and been treated by self-made robots.
Data are sets of interpretations, human’s interpretations, which means, intrinsically subjective.
Objective data, by definition do not exist.
So, my aknowledged data are as suitable to my subject, than yours to your own subject.
Data (on both side) have been introduced on this threat, what remains are “dialectics”based on conflict of interest.
I defend the camp of people who do not believe, but think.
You defend the camp of a minority who profits from that crisis.
I don’t believe,I judge based on my observation.
Unfortunately, by now I’m accustomed to being attacked for making simple statements of fact - even statements that can’t be disputed, like stating that it is indisputable that official statistics exist. We live in an age where people are either paid, or politically motivated, to anonymously make false statements about what other people say and hurl insults with the purpose of confusing others about the facts, or distracting them from the facts.
I’m not going to directly respond to the latest ad hominem attack on me, above, other than to thank the forum members who pointed out that I didn’t make any statements suggesting that the official figures are correct or incorrect, and that falsely accusing other members of making such statements for a nefarious purpose, or through dishonest means, is not appropriate and not what this forum, or this thread, are about.
This guy has some blind followers, he should be a religion or cult leader
cases in the country are on the rise…
What does that even mean ?!! 
Never Ever let anyone stick anything into your nose and your head…
Nasal Swab Testing Insanity – DON’T DO IT!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ggdr6l8jT0RL/
Does the PCR Test Detect the Virus?
The Corona Simulation Machine: Why the Inventor of The “Corona Test” Would Have Warned Us Not To Use It To Detect A Virus
https://www.globalresearch.ca/was-covid-19-test-meant-detect-virus/5724713
What is Covid-19, SARS-2. How is it Tested? How is It Measured? The Fear Campaign Has No Scientific Basis
https://www.globalresearch.ca/what-is-covid-19-sars-2-how-is-it-tested-how-is-it-measured-the-fear-campaign-has-no-scientific-basis/5722566
Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Says “Second Wave” Faked on False-Positive COVID Tests, “Pandemic Is Over”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/chief-science-officer-pfizer-says-second-wave-faked-false-positive-covid-tests-pandemic-over/5724753
I listen to reliable medical experts, and Dr. Fauci is still one of them, luckily, though that could change at any moment.
Blind followers?
I bet the people that listen to Dr. Fauci have more education and higher IQ scores than people that don't.
Yes, we might follow him as long as he is still reliable, but we sure as **** aren't blind. 
As to the rest of your post, by all means, keep on spreading misinformation. 
(That's about all you've done on BLF for over six months now.)
No one is trolling except some weirdo fake experts and reporters, spewing some nonsense on mainstream media each and every single day for the last 6 months…
Are you saying that he and other “medical experts” may become unreliable some day, all of a sudden ?!
Good for you my friend, keep following him… as long as he is still reliable :laughing:
Don’t be so sure about that… 
Blaha, Blaha, Blah
BORING
Not all of them at once, but some medical experts have given in to political pressure in the U.S. and are no longer trustworthy.
It could happen to Fauci, too.
I just joined BLF recently and it’s really funny to see people arguing about COVID and politics on a flashlight forum (:
I think everyone should do what they want. Like masks? Buy one and wear it day and night if it makes you happy. Don’t like masks? Don’t wear one
Thunderay: it is misleading to assert that the globalresearch website claims Dr. Fauci is currently saying that Covid-19 has a death rate similar to the death rate of influenza. The website uses a statement Dr. Fauci made in March about the data they had at that early stage of its spread in North America — and we now know the death rate is many times higher than that. In fact, shortly after that statement was made and consistently thereafter, Dr. Fauci made very different statements about the death rate from Covid-19, based on the data that was increasingly collected in North America as cases increased there.
As for nasal swabs, the advice you are giving is the opposite of the advice given by actual disease and virology experts. See this article: https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/which-test-is-best-for-covid-19-2020081020734
The nasal swab is the best alternative, because it gives fewer false negatives than other methods. Most false positives are the result of errors in the lab, and other problems with how the results are handled or analyzed, not the result of flaws in the test.
One might reasonably ask why you are spinning old data to minimize the danger of the virus at the current time? Why are you discouraging people from taking the most effective type of test for Covid-19, according to the experts?
Well, in my perspective, it ain’t that simple!
If you’re infected and you don’t wear a mask just because it doesn’t make you happy, and you happen to infect me or other people, besides putting many lives at risk (under a medical perspective), you are committing the crime of public propagation of disease (under a legal perspective).
So… happinness and wearing a mask is probably not the best correlation to do here! Actually, wearing a mask doesn’t make me happy, but will probably make me safer (under a scientific perspective).
Of course, if you choose not to wear a mask due to - and I really mean it - STUPID, biased and unfounded beliefs you are just doing it under political perspective.
And, unfortunately, this is the one by which many people in many countries…seem to prefer to be guided! And therefore they will be - again - STUPIDLY putting at risk other peoples lives, the so-called “reopening” and many other things in society, some of which can be framed under an economical perspective.
Thanks Photon Master After all we still are in a flashlight forum
About a good headlamp recommendation, I may not be the best person to do that :zipper_mouth_face: I only have 2 so far, so I don’t have much experince with headlamps. Maybe the one from Sofirn can be a good choice, under a budget perspective!
However, if you have some more money to spend, eventually other brands can suit your needs in terms of the required specs
You've posted multiple times in this thread, and you're just noticing this now?
A lot of this thread is people arguing over COVID-19 and politics. 
This would be great news if no second wave occurs. i watch the daily reporting of 215 countries and other entities for new cases and deaths reported. It seems hard to believe that all these entities would be using the same unreliable test? Could this be true and all the daily reports are in error? It may not be as deadly as it was in March, but the daily death rate is nearly the same at about 5k per day. Are these deaths being falsely reported from around the world?
It’s possible to survive a single-lung pneumonia, but double pneumonia is mostly fatal. The covid-19 seems to be a more deadly version of influenza—what is it that you propose people to do in this situation?
Heh-heh, a Bitch Ute…
