Joshk,
are you able to give us the name of the scientist (or group of scientists) who managed to isolate the so-called “covid-19”?
YES or NO ?
I believe you nailed it. Time to stop responding to John75. Perhaps he will retreat to his home under the bridge.
To coin a phrase, “it takes two to tango”.
cabfrank, mocking poor people may be a sensitive topic, but instead of “calling for troll and hate speech” why not you answer the question above ?
Excellent remark, let’s remember or discover about the first efficient treatment against variola.
Do you know what was the protocol of vaccination and the exact composition of the “vaccine”?
Let me help you :
he earliest smallpox (variola) prevention efforts date back to at least the 10th century in China, when physicians found that nasal inoculation of susceptible persons with material from smallpox lesions would sometimes provide immunity.
The practice of inoculation appears to have arisen independently in several other regions prior to the 17th century, including Africa and India, but the practice did not gain popularity in western Europe until the 18th century.
The wife of an English ambassador, Lady Montagu, observed inoculation in Turkey, and later had her own child successfully inoculated during a smallpox epidemic in England.
In this procedure a lancet or needle was used to deliver a subcutaneous dose of smallpox material to a susceptible person. The procedure, also known as variolation, was controversial. +It generated immunity in many cases, but it also killed some people and contributed to smallpox outbreaks.
+
A more safe and effective method for smallpox control originated in the late 18th century when Dr. Edward Jenner of Gloucestershire, England noticed that milkmaids exposed to cowpox appeared to be immune to smallpox.
He tested his hypothesis by inoculating a boy with cowpox pus and subsequently challenging him with smallpox. The experiment was a success, and Jenner prepared a paper describing this case along with 13 other individuals who had contracted either horsepox or cowpox before being exposed to smallpox. In one of the worst editorial decisions of all time, the Royal Society rejected the paper and suggested that Jenner cease his cowpox investigations.
Jenner wisely ignored this advice, named the cowpox material the “vaccine virus”, and thus discovered the concept of vaccination.1, 6 Early smallpox vaccinations utilized pustular material from one vaccinated person to directly inoculate another person by scratching the material into the recipient’s arm. Later improvements included the inoculation of cow flanks to obtain larger quantities of virus, and use of glycerol solution as a preservative.
A textbook published in the early 20th century described the vaccination process as follows:
There was no intravenous injection, neither use of hazardous adjuvant added to the treatment.
Ask yourself why after 1950, some scientists decided to add-on highly neurotoxic adjuvants through intravenous “vaccinal” solution.
Ask yourself why autism or Alzheimer’s “syndromes” were quasi inexistent before “modern vaccination campaign”.
SHALL THAT BE THE NEW NORM ?
Well one could point out that autism was actually described during the time of Martin Luther… That smallpox was a thing that became no more due to vacinations…
Oh my. As my great grandma might have said, mention the Devil and you’ll hear the rustle of his wings.
Mention vaccination …… oops. Gish gallop. Sorry I loosened that cork.
In recent news:
PS — when the CDC says “an” they should say “any” infected person.
It’s not limited to the total time around just one infected person.
Thus so much illness among medical people == the exposures add up.
I am writing about vaccines and neurotoxic adjuvants, and you, you bring your great grandma’s evil superstitions in the debate?
Yep, I've learned the hard way that sometimes it's best just to ignore certain people. 
You should try harder.
Why did my post disappear, again 
Here’s is the second part of that one.
An example of how the global medical m@f$a$ - including the WHO - are suppressing everything related to natural treatments >>>
Malaria Business: “Profit comes before public health interests”
Artemisia has been banned! (watch the full video inside)
https://www.garymoller.com/post/artemisia-has-been-banned
and this is the CV treatment… no need to any poisons…
A Novel Approach to Treating COVID-19 Using Nutritional and Oxidative Therapies
https://ozonewithoutborders.ngo/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Novel-Approach-to-Covid-19.pdf
If a person comes in contact with a common-cold virus but doesn’t get sick, do we say they are sick with a cold? Do we describe that as a “case” of the common cold? Of course we don’t. Cases of the common cold are people who come down with symptoms. If there were a test for that cold virus, the asymptomatic person would probably test ‘positive’ because there is some of the virus in his body, but it’s being fought off successfully by his immune system and he’s not sick.
With that in mind, why are all positive test results for Covid counted as “Covid cases” in nationwide scare statistics, when the vast majority (some say 90%) of those who test ‘positive’ never show any symptoms? Shouldn’t actual Covid “cases” be limited to people who are sick with Covid, just as we have always used the nomenclature with all other illnesses for decades?
The best scientific estimates of the percentage of infected people who are infected but remain asymptomatic range from 20% to 40% - not 90%. And the scientists stress that most people who are asymptomatic at the time of a test will eventually develop at least mild symptoms. Many people with mild Covid-19 symptoms eventually also develop long-term health problems.
One reason why it is necessary to classify infected but asymptomatic people as infected is that asymptomatic individuals can still spread the virus to others. Prevention of the spread of the virus requires infected people to be identified and separated from non-infected individuals. If you don’t know who is infected, you can’t slow the spread of the virus.
Hi everyone, my inclination is still to try to not close this thread, but everybody has to help me out here. I think we can keep it open if everyone learns from which have been the hot button topics thus far and carefully avoiding them. Specifically:
- Comments on Trump’s handling and assessment of the situation
- Comments on the efficacy or inefficacy of the government response in specific regions or countries
- Comments on the origin of SARS-CoV-2
- Discussions on whether vaccines are good or bad
- Discussions on whether using masks is good or bad
- Anything that is widely considered to be a conspiracy theory
As it looks like this topic is heating up again I'll try to be more vigilant and strictly enforce the above specific prohibitions as well as the general BLF rules as they apply to this thread. This warning is not directed at anybody in particular, as there have been a lot of inappropriate comments and resulting arguments in the past few pages of this thread. However, from this point forward I will publicly require specific users to go back and delete or edit their posts that violate the rules.
BLF Rules:
BY REGISTERING AN ACCOUNT YOU ALREADY IMPLICITLY AGREED TO ABIDE BY THESE RULES:
- Please don't be rude. Rude people will have their accounts deleted.
- Please don't use dirty language, please don't swear, and please avoid lewd or risqué conversations.
- Please avoid controversial or divisive subjects such as religion and politics.
- Please avoid fighting. If you or somebody else is losing their calm, please drop the subject.
- Please don't even think about spamming this forum. Spammers will be prosecuted.
- Please don't even think about using this forum for illegal activities. Criminals will be prosecuted.
- By registering an account, you agree to the BudgetLightForum.com Privacy Policy.
- All opinions expressed by users of this website may or may not be accurate, and as such BudgetLightForum.com does not officially endorse them. BudgetLightForum.com does not encourage risky behavior, and will not be responsible for physical, emotional, financial or other damages resulting from the use or misuse of any information or misinformation expressed herein. All users are encouraged to use good judgement before making any physical, financial or other decisions based on the information or misinformation expressed on BudgetLightForum.com.
- Have fun.
That’s a great concise summary on the smallpox history, thank you for pulling that together.
[edit] oops i just saw the rules post so i won’t discuss this anymore.
So all the healthy younger victims were really just “very weak people” ???
Young healthy Doctors?
Yeah OK
Try again skippy.
Thank you SB.
Yes, thank you SB. And please add “contempt for mask users” to the list of comments that are not allowed as that has been at the root of many outbreaks in this thread.