OSRAM CSLNM1.TG & CULNM1.TG 1mm², CSLPM1.TG & CULPM1.TG 2mm²

I understand everything apart from the maths haha.

I had a stabilized output in my thinking which is different so now I understand regulation more now

My latest chart on the OSRAM's. If anyone can verify, change, or fill in blanks, please do so.


OSRAM LED’s for max throw

Color - Part # - footprint (LED surface) nickname Max/Pulsed Peak Output (A)

White – KW CSLNM1.TG – 3030 (1mm²) W1 3/3.3A 4.5-5.0 A (W1/NM1)
White – KW CSLPM1.TG – 3030 (2mm²) W2 5/6A 7.0-8.0 A (W2/PM1)

White – KW CULNM1.TG – 4040 (1mm²) W2.1 3.3/4A ~6A (Boost HL)
White – KW CULPM1.TG – 4040 (2mm²) W2.2 6.6/8A 9 A (Boost HX)

Red – KR CSLNM1.23 – 3030 (1mm²) W1

Blue – KB CSLNM1.14 – 3030 (1mm²) W1

Green – KP CSLNM1.F1 – 3030 (1mm²) W1 3/4A 6.5 – 7.0 A
Green – KP CSLPM1.F1 – 3030 (2mm²) W1

Yellow – KY CSLNM1.FY - 3030 (1mm²) W1

More OSRAM Website links

3030 variants

4040 (boost) variants

Clear and simple. Thanks Tom!

Tom E, you may want to fix the nicknames back there: if the NM1 and PM1 are Wn, where n = die area in mm², then the Boost HL and HX which are their bigger footprint counterparts should be dubbed Wn.something, W1+ for the KW CULNM1.TG and W2+ for the KW CULPM1.TG, for example. You could also add some proper, simple surnames to the color variants for the sake of simplicity (just remember that the pure green is the phosphor converted green, with some CRI, despite being listed with a narrow frequency window versus the true green).

Just a suggestion.

It’s a small indutance value of 0.47uH, the smaller the inductance the smaller the DCR usually, which is another reason you want a small inductance value in such small place, to actually minimize DCR at high currents.
Still it is small inductor, low profile, I cannot imagine constant current at 8A, for lower currents like 3A surely no problems. I would like to see a review with a flashlight, without artificial active cooling.
Otherwise it seems to look good for example appears like a couple of external FETs rather than integrated into the switching IC.

Sorry, going with Hank's K1 conventions for nick naming these things - https://intl-outdoor.com/k1-21700-thrower-led-flashlight.html.

Don't think it's the best, but thought Hank was following other conventions.

I'm keeping this is a Word docx file for now. Will make it public when it's more finalized. I've learned a few things since putting this together. The different flavors always had me confused somewhat. For white, looks like the Boost HL and Boost HX are making the old W1 and W2's obsolete, except for the pricing.

Hank's convention seems to be Wm.n, where m is footprint (1 = 3030, 2 = 4040) and n is die size in mm².

Honestly, I still :-) prefer the manufacturer's name; can't go wrong with it.

The 3030 emitters obsolete? I don't think so. As far as I am aware there basically is only one test done of the white flat 1mm² (Reflow conditions tested of Osram KW CSLNM1-KW (White Flat 1mm2)), and even less about the 2mm² (here), both in 3030 footprint.

In all honesty, I find hardly believable that going from 3030 to 4040 footprint can provide much of a performance gain for emitters so small die size wise. And mind you, there are 0 actual tests of the 4040 emitters; just a lot of gossip. A good emitter bin can make a much bigger difference in practice.

In any case let me tell you these are being sold fairly expensive right now, in my opinion of course. And you know why.

Not my cup of tea, in all honesty.

Gossip? Hank has #'s for his K1. I received yesterday 2 K1 drivers and 1 Boost HL on a 32 mm 4040 MCPCB. Not sure yet where it's gonna go though - think'n of a BOSS1 (100 mm head diam reflector light). I'm not setup or have the time for testing the LED though.

I couldn’t achieve over 1318 lumens (30s) driven to 8A, 7A was 5 lumens lower. Barely any gain over the W2

Do you mean Boost HX? the 2mm^2 version?

The Boost HL is the KW CULNM1.TG, what Hank calls the W2.1, he rates at 650 kcd in the K1.

The Boost HX is the KW CULPM1.TG, what Hank calls the W2.2, he rates at 600 kcd in the K1.

Not sure why you think I might have that wrong. The one I received is a small square LED surface on a 4040 MCPCB, so really can only be the Boost HL, which apparently beats the Boost HX in throw in the K1. Not to say the amps are properly maximized, but I don't think Hank will make claims of kcd without measuring it.

You are talking about a Boost HX, not Boost HL, is that right? I have a Boost HL - it beats the Boost HX in the stock K1 (650 kcd for the HL, 600 kcd for the HX).

Boost HL is the smaller square dye, while the HX is the bigger rectangular dye.

I see - looks like Simon only sells the Boost HX, not the Boost HL. With Hank in the K1 you have a choice of either (and if you ask patiently, he may sell you a mounted LED, whichever one you request ).

Yes, the HX. I really get lost with the Osram model names.

SkyLumen was the first to use the WF1/2/1.1/2.1 name format AFAIK, and honestly it makes a lot of sense IMO. I have to look up the actually model numbers half the time I see people discussing them to remember which is being referenced.

I was asking because I didn’t know anyone still had HLs for sale. I’ve been looking for one for since LED4P went oos and Osram obsoleted the model. I’ll get one before they’re gone…

Also, if Hank is calling them W2.1, that would be opposite naming convention from what I am familiar with. Typically (Vin/Skylumen), the ‘.1’ extension indicates the newer/upgraded 4040 package, while the W (n) still denotes the emitting surface area. So the HL would be a W1.1 in Vin shorthand, and HX= W2.1

Seems like Hanks naming convention is different, which will add to the confusion with these letter soup Osrams.

There's no "if Hank", Hank is. I've included the link to where he does it couple times - here it is again: https://intl-outdoor.com/led-flashlights/k1-21700-thrower-led-flashlight.html

Been look'n at the Skylumen site and found a W1.1 ref: https://skylumen.com/collections/v54-lights/products/one-off-olights, where he identifies the W1.1 as the max throw version

And here's a W2.1 ref: https://skylumen.com/collections/v54-lights/products/one-off-l17vn-the-tactical-mc13vn

Of course he doesn't say what these LED's are, that I can find.

On BLF, Hank and his lights are far more popular than Vinh (sheer volume) so I'd stick with Hank's, unless Hank can be convinced to change his naming convention.

Yeap, Vinh has limited audience where Hank is widely known so yes, i agree with Tom.
Adding bypassed wire at the spring on somebody else’s design doesn’t make you refference in this business.

TomE, I don’t know why it seems I’m rubbing you the wrong way and if I did, I apologize. I’m not challenging you, Hank, Vinh, nor anyone. I’m trying to clarify where there are differences, both in my understanding, and among greater BLF. I’m sorry if my familiarity and opinion that another naming convention is/was more popular seems confrontational.

Personally, I have no problem remembering or typing out full Osram model numbers. Shorthand is merely a convenience. If it starts to cause more confusion that the longform, then it’s not worth it IMO.

id30209, while I have personal feelings that seem to reflect yours about the parties we are discussing, I think it’s fair to acknowledge that in the early days of 4040 white flats, Vinh was one of the exclusive sources of these emitters and lights equipped with them. Not until the K1/KR1 was there any whisper of these emitters in Hanks main thread. In fact, searching that thread for either w1.1 or w2.1 only returns one post by SKV89 from May 2020. I can trace back the W1.1 on CPF/Vinh as far as August 2019.

Searching all of BLF for “w2.2” only yields a handful of hits besides here. All are from Sept/Oct 2020 except one by Agro which may have been a typo as he changed it to w2.1 at some point (original frozen in time by the quote in the following post) Ironically here, I was one of the few to ever write w.2.2 back in Sept 2020 , and I’d like to say it was a error as well that got away from me, but I used that” two times”:Lume1-FW3X: Constant Current Buck-Boost & FET Driver with Anduril1/2 + RGB Aux - #368 by JaredM in that thread, albeit only 11hrs apart.

Again, I’m really, honestly not trying to ruffle feathers. I’ve added to the confusion myself as I just pointed out in the previous paragraph. id30209 also has acknowledged the W2.1= Boost HX in the Convoy thread not too long ago. Now that I’ve spent a bit of time playing etymologist, it’s fair for me to say there isn’t a widely accepted standard on BLF and we all can get confused by these alpha numerics at times.

Going forward, I’m probably going to stick to the full names of these emitters.

Cheers everyone!

@JaredM

Neven from L4P had W2.1 and 1.1 way before Vinh...

Later on they showed up in Vietnamese groups and so on. Only this year they became more available.