[Available again! - BLF special edition light] new Sofirn AAA twisty high CRI 5mm LED

I doubt that (but I do not have one to check), the bad beam of the red C01 seems to me not caused by the reflector. I think it is because the light emitting area of the red led is much smaller than a white led because it has no wide phosfor layer. And small light sources need carefully manufactured optics to make a good beam, the top surface of a cheap chinese 5mm led is likely far from optical quality, or even 5mm Nichia leds.

Thanks djozz, I might try it tomorrow before I Scotch-Brite the led. Just to see if it helps.

Djozz, thanks for this, this will be a great little backup light for hiking, starts high and keeps it pretty good for 4-6 hours, that is what I was looking for. Much appreciated.

Measured up to 7.5 hours now, time to go to bed. Will have another look tomorrow if there is still light, I assume that just as the unmodded C01 it will drain the battery to completely empty. The runtime chart sofar:

Hmm…no regulation without a sense resistor to regulate. I guess I should have seen that coming.

I assume with something in between, like a 10 ohm resistor, we’d see in the ballpark of 12-14 lumens steady for maybe 2 hours or so, then the long decline.

Another datapoint, 14 hrs / 0.6 lumen.

Yes, no regulation, I already noticed that without resistor it does not light, it is simply is series with the led somewhere I guess (before or after boosting?, no idea how that works really).
I’m not fanatic in constant output, a steady decline is useful, like the incan days, there is not so much that demands steady brightness and a slowly fading light does not leave you with surprises.

I had ruined one black C01 while finding out about the potting. So it was spare for some fun. :slight_smile: (did this to a sk68 too a couple of years ago)

LOL it`s even cut one of the Vias in half! :smiley:

That is one awesome pic! :+1:

Well done. You can’t deny the potting crew did a good job on that one.
BTW I downloaded a copy of the SK68 picture for “recreational use”, I can’t help smiling. :+1:

Yes, that one was the best ever because of the irregularities and moving parts in the design :slight_smile:

Looks like you could shorten the light by trimming/sanding the head and “reflector” shorter too.

Great pics and RIP C01 used for testing…

All hail the “in the name of flashlight science” !!! :beer:
Thanks djozz, that’s an awesome photo and cut!!!

Neat, a physical cross-section of a light is way cooler than any CAD diagram!

Two more datapoints: 14hrs 0.6lumen, 24hrs 0.1lumen. I call this test a day :slight_smile: Battery voltage is 0.57V now.

Wow, this looks nice. One unsuspecting question: is such a test available for the stock Sophia LED C01 as well?

Just in case anyone had any doubt remaining about whether there is an O-ring around the LED!

In fact, this shows it is better installed that I expected - there is a full groove for the O-ring. On the Sunwayman R01A, it is merely held in place in a shallow counterbore by the flange at the base of the emitter.

Great idea for the dead light, and nice work cleaning it up. I really like cutaways, even when it’s a simple item. There’s even a museum in my area that has an entire tank cut in half like this. I spent probably close to an hour studying it last time I was there.

Also, since I looked it up, here’s the SK68 cutaway post:

I think that someone did that for the Yuji led version, maybe even me :person_facepalming: but it is probably buried in this long thread somewhere, and this Sophia version will not be miles different. Think the same curve as above but starting at 7 lumen, less fast decline and stretching out to over 40 hours.

Thanks, sounds very reasonable.

The cross section is funny and inspiring as well :smiley: