I found an article from October:
If you don't like Reuters, there are plenty of other articles available (on this subject) online.
EDIT:
And here's an article from August on the first vaccine:
https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/russia-approves-worlds-first-coronavirus-vaccine-67810
(I don't know how reliable The Scientist is.)
Yes, as I said. It really was a test, else the russian citizens would have been vaccinated by now. Few days ago they started with their soldiers.
EXCERPT
In Russia soldiers are what peasants are in China: abundant, interchangeable and expendable.
IMHO it’s the final test-phase of the vaccin. You might call them human gunea pigs.
Politics is priority #1. Everything else is secundary or collateral damage. Look at the Olympics.
Pfizer given protection from legal action over coronavirus vaccine by UK government.
The UK government has granted pharmaceutical giant Pfizer a legal indemnity protecting it from being sued, enabling its coronavirus vaccine to be rolled out across the country as early as next week.
The Department of Health and Social Care has confirmed the company has been given an indemnity protecting it from legal action as a result of any problems with the vaccine.
Ministers have also changed the law in recent weeks to give new protections to companies such as Pfizer, giving them immunity from being sued by patients in the event of any complications.
NHS staff providing the vaccine, as well as manufacturers of the drug, are also protected.
The vaccine will be made available to anyone over the age of 16 but will not be available to pregnant women because of the lack of data about how it could affect them and the baby. An ongoing trial is looking at this.
The Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine was authorised by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency on Tuesday under regulation 174 of the Human Medicine Regulations 2012 which allows an unlicensed medication to be used in an emergency such as a pandemic.
It also has the effect of granting civil immunity to Pfizer after the government changed the regulations following a short three-week consultation in September.
In a press conference with journalists on Wednesday, Ben Osborn, Pfizer’s UK managing director, refused to explain why the company needed an indemnity.
He said: “We’re not actually disclosing any of the details around any of the aspects of that agreement and specifically around the liability clauses.”
The Department of Health and Social Care confirmed an indemnity was in place for Pfizer and added that the government would be adding the coronavirus vaccine to the list of vaccinations covered by the Vaccine Damages Payments Act.
This pays out a one-off £120,000 payment to people who are permanently disabled or harmed as a result of a listed vaccination.
Not looking for comments on this, but yeah….no.
Not gonna lie, there is definitely a non-zero risk to taking a vaccine that was developed in a rush for a virus we know little about. I’m going to be watching the early results of the rollout carefully before rushing in for mine.
Never thought I would like a politician 
Was interesting to learn of how some of the tests are so far off. However, the article cited makes conclusions that are simply not grounded in reality.
Another example of people who believe that the whole thing is a hoax. Mass graves and temporary morgues in many places yet somehow it is just faulty testing and there really isn’t a problem? The damage being done to our health care system and especially the health care workers by the spreading of such misleading information is beyond cruel.
I'm not in a high-priority group, so I won't be getting a vaccine for many months.
I hope that by then we'll know which vaccines are truly safe and effective.
>lifesitenews. <=== mediabiasfactcheck
Gasp! Why, they make it sound like publishing the accuracy data is a bad thing.
The RPMs are high on this one.
Claims like this, particularly, stand out as bad journalistic spin:
WTF? Of coure there are more false positive results reported when there are more tests performed. The percentage of false positives doesn’t change though the total adds up…
That has nothing to do with the accuracy, admittedly low, of the rapid test method, which is characteristic of the individual test being used, not the size of the population being tested.
Backing slowly away from the keyboard ……
Looks like my source I quoted is a good one:
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-scientist/
I guess I should check mediabiasfactcheck before I post a link to an article.
=== in other test-related news:
Ha! Whoever he is, I like him!
That’s from: https://www.quora.com/q/coronavirus?*ni*=0&*nsrc*=4&*snid3*=14611666228&*tiids*=16309582
https://www.quora.com/profile/Mitchell-Tsai
That was me. I called him last February and we agreed wiping out the humans would be for the best.
savethewildlife 
Yeah, in particular some kind of humans… :person_facepalming: :smiling_imp:
Josef Mengele would be proud of you.
My alarm clock in the morning is Angel of Death by Slayer 
EDIT: I am trolling
Although my above statement is true!
It is my second alarm after “Feeling Good” by Michael Bublé!