Which movie did you watch lastֻ

“A Bridge too Far”
.
Afterwards I looked at several Youtube vids on its history.
.
Terrible decisions made on that one, to even attempt it was the biggest.
.

The star power certainly wasn’t lacking in the production.

I saw A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master (1988).

It's bad.

Most of the movie is pretty boring and not entertaining.

There is an action sequence near the end of the movie that is quite lame.

Someone is defeated in the movie, and the way they are defeated is really stupid.

On the other hand, the music is actually pretty good.

Overall, I think this film is as bad as Part 2, which is not a compliment in the least.

The Brave One

had potential, but here is the
street definition of potential:
Never Done Nothing.

1. Jodie Foster in love with a guy?
2. she bought a 9mm Kahr for $1K in 2007.
3. like most movies: boys die, girls live.

since it was lousy weather (rain/sleet/snow/repeat)
we stayed inside and watched absolutely all of it.
of course, we got bored before Jodie gets out of the hospital,
and i got on Craig’s List and bought some silver dimes. i heard a rumor.

The Little Things with Denzel, Rami and Jared.

A puzzler, but worth the freebi.

Chris

The Harder They Fall.

last Bogart movie.
i saw the “soft” ending.
you will not miss much if you do not watch it.

I saw A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child (1989).

This movie is terrible.

It's pretty lame and boring.

The acting is awful, and the film is frustrating to watch in some parts.

I did not care for the safety of the main characters, which is a bad sign.

The ending is bad as well.

Part 5 is the worst film in the series (up to Part 5.)

Beat the Devil.

1. another Bogart movie.
2. do not waste your time.
3. unless you like Gina Lollobrigida.

Muscle shoals. A documentary about the recording industry in Muscle Shoals, Alabama.
Incredible story.

I saw Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare (1991), which I will call Part 6.

This movie is not that great.

It's about as good as Part 2 or Part 4.

The acting is bad.

The movie is mostly boring and lame.

During the credits, the filmmakers show clips from the franchise up to this point, and sadly, it is not that impressive.

“1917”. It’s a quality movie, good suspense. Only thing is, the ending wasn’t as happy as I’d have liked.

Just watched avengers endgame.

AlphaGo

Cool AI vs human documentary. Recommended.

Hey RC
I don’t remember how many Nightmares (and spin offs) there were but after the first few it was all pretty lame until Wes Craven’s New Nightmare in 1994. The premise was the real actors and crew vs. you know who. I don’t want to give anything away so I’ll leave it at that. Hope you enjoy it!

PS the remake had more current SFX but that’s about it, no style etc.

I'll be watching every film in the series.

The only two that I haven't seen yet are the ones that you mentioned.

Under the Silver Lake - not bad if you like off beat trippy movies. Thought it was a little too long but again, not bad.

Amazing cinematography but the plot was weak and not very true to life. Overall, I was disappointed with this one - it was OK but could have been so much better if they had told a true story or at least a better fiction.

I saw Wes Craven's New Nightmare (1994), which I will call Part 7.

This movie is okay.

The acting is actually quite good--the best in the series so far.

The music is great.

The problem is that the movie is pretty stupid.

The plot/script is not that good, and the movie isn't all that entertaining.

The movie is frustrating to watch in some parts.

Overally, it's a little worse than Part 1.

thanks Pete7874 for AlphaGo.

at least i could understand it
better than the one episode
i saw of The Queen’s Gambit.

LOL! :smiley: