"(PRE)VIEW" – Lumintop FW1AA (Sample)

Here’s some more photos from the flashlight.

I took the MCPCB out, checked the dimensions, tried a 10mm MCPCB from kaidomain, tried different TIR optics, and also compared it with “my” FW1AA (described before).

Took out the red glue and the kapton tape. There was some thermal paste below the MCPCB, not as abundant as I initially thought, because it was more concentrated on the sides of the MCPCB.
No, those circles are not holes, just parts slightly deep than the rest of the shelf.

These are the dimensions of the MCPCB. The total height of the shelf (from the below up to the top, or what thefreeman mentioned as B in is drawing) is 3mm.

This is the Kaidomain MCBPC, that can fit IF you file it on the “corners”. It is not a straight fit. The original MCBPC needs to be put into that hole vertically, and will not fit diagonally or in other positions. There is virtually “no space” between it and the inner walls of the shelf, only enough space for it to “slide” down or up.


See the below of the shelf and the thickness.

And the driver…in case it is needed.

As for the optics, first, here’s a comparison with “my” FW1AA (LH351D, in a copper MCPCB from the EagleEyE X3R, a 3535 gasket from Simon (trimmed) and TIR from the S1R Baton I), on the right.
My modified flashlight has a gap between the bezel and the lower part of the threads, due to the height of the TIR and the MCPCB.

Also, with an FWAA:

Here’s a comparison of beam profiles.
VS “my” FW1AA (right)

VS “my” FW1AA & FWAA

And now, some experiences with different TIR Optics.

First, the one of S1R Baton I.

The glass lens was NOT used, the black gasket was not used. If the gasket was used, the TIR wouldn’t sit correctly, and if the lens was used (with or without gasket), there would be a gap between the bezel and threads.

However, since those 2 elements were not used, there was a slight gap between the bezel and the TIR, which makes the flashlight not waterproof.

The beam generated has artifacts, light circles around that intense and typical hotspot that the SIR Baton has. There was some spill.
The beam, compared to “my” FW1AA, has a stronger hotspot, a slight tint shift in the corona, and less spill but it still exists.

This one is with a 15mm Yajimei TIR optic that I had laying around.
This one is a clear lens, narrower beam, less large than the optic above and than the original reflector.
Since it has a small hole for the LED, the black gasket was not used, but since it is less larger than the bezel, the glass lens was used. Given the height of the optic, there was a small gap between the bezel and the threads.

The beam generated is not good, due to the bad centering (no gasket) and the clear surface of the optic. The center has a “hole” and is yellowish/greenish, and the overall beam is “yellowish”. Not good at all.

I could have tried a similar optic - 60º pebbled - , but since this is a “thrower”, it wouldn’t be worthy trying a completely floody optic, in my opinion.


@ JaredM

Given these experiences, and given that the 17mm Yajimei optics is taller than the 15mm optic, I would say that…. maybe it can be used without the glass lens and eventually without gasket, but without certainties about generating a gap in the bezel/threads.


The original is 1.8mm tall, and the suitable diameter - to do what you mentioned - would be 15.5mm, more or less. I tried to use a 16mm PCB before and it didn’t fit (at least without being filed/trimmed).

Is there a source for that Baton optic? I like that it has a frosted center. I find clear, smooth TIRs with this center cavity frosted make smooth but intense beams. Clear centers often create ‘ghost images’ of the emitter in the corona and can be pretty distracting in use.

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/727344383.html

I have a few of these. Best beam I’ve gotten from a small TIR, even with 1mm² emitters

I am not sure if the Baton TIRs are available out there. I’ve seen people modding Olights but with other optics, so I am not sure if they can be found out there.

I don’t actually like clear optics, I normally go with frosted or pebbled ones because they make the beam floodier, which I prefer.

I need to go back to my searches in AliExpress to see if any of them is compatible with this flashlight! If I find one, I let you know :wink:

I actually just wasted a solid hour combing through AE for better options… no dice.

The way I see it, the FWAA is the perfect little flooder. Compact, triple, and the tail e-switch is actually convenient such that I can operate the light with my tongue while holding it in my mouth.

To compliment it, I’d try to get as tight of a beam as possible with an SST20 or 219b, while minimizing artifacts. But the more I think about it, the pairing I have right now with my FW1A TIR SST20 4000k and FWAA sw45k is as close to perfect for EDC as I may get without designing my own light from scratch. And until there is an appropriate clip for these it’ll never be my primary anyway.

The original FW1A clip is pretty darn good. The double sided clips really are no good.

Yes, I think a 10mm mcpcb will work with a 3535 LED and the stock centering ring

optimistic I am :wink:

Agreed.

FW1A / FW3A clip is excellent.

Unfortunately, the latest fad among flashlight manufacturers seems to be 2-way clips. And all the 2-way clips are garbage. The FWAA’s clip is no exception.

  • It’s too small to feel secure in a pocket,
  • The reverse clip gets caught on things making it awkward to use
  • The clip sticks out fairly far from the light making a slim light thicker than it needs to be.

Having a 2-way clip is ONLY useful for carrying the light on a ball cap. If you’re like me and never do that a traditional 1-way clip is always better … preferably with deep-carry.

I’m hoping the 2-way clip fad passes soon so we can get useful clips with our lights again.

Yeah, I thought so :zipper_mouth_face: Optics like the one from the S1R are difficult to find.
I tried another one, from the Amutorch S3 but the beam is also far from good and it is taller than needed to avoid any gap.

I guess those boards from Kaidomain, if filed a littel bit in the “corners”, can be put in place to use SST20 or Nichias and eventually LH351D LEDs. The thermal path will probably suffer because it is not a straight fit and it will not make a good contact as the original MCPCB. Still worths a try.

About the clip, yeah, I’d prefer something like the 2way clip from the FW3A/FW1A that is sold by Neal. That is probably the best option allowing deep carry and also the possibility to use it in a cap. The current version from the FWAA/FW1AA is not the most favourable one, but…it works.

BTW, the FW1AA is as tall as the FW3A with the 18500 tube. I will try to get a “family” photo meanwhile and put them side-by-side.

The FWxx family comparison:

FW1A > FW3A (18650) > FW1AA > my FW1AA > FWAA

FW1A > FW3A (18500) > FW1AA > my FW1AA > FWAA

FW1A > FW1AA > my FW1AA > FWAA > FW3A (18350)

The large difference in throw is the key thing that separates this from an fwaa. Without that large difference what’s the point. The problems for me are the cool white and low-cri. If those two problems can be overcome then I could possibly put down my fw1a with the original reflector. With a narrow beam you can put light on specific objects without cranking things up to Max or turbo and chewing through a whole lot of battery. I carry a separate light for when I need flood and run time.

Thanks for all these additional details and measurements :+1:

I guess the throw is really the point on this bet for the LED/SMO reflector.
I still have to take it outdoor and get some beamshots and rough measurements on the range
As I pointed out above, the small MCPCB from Kaidomain can be used (with some adjustments) to make it work with 3535 LEDs, but that’s up to each one. I haven’t done it yet so that I can show the original beam but after that I will try this mod. I am not sure how the reflector will act, but that will be adjusted later on!

Thanks and I hope it helps in some way :wink:

A light like this is ideally sized for an EDC.

In an EDC, it may be nice to have a generalist light with some throw, good CRI, good color temperature, good output, and decent flood. Basically something good for close and medium range.

  • The problem with the FWAA is that it is ALL flood. It’s almost a mule and is pretty much only good for close-range use. Many of us find it too floody.
  • Using an Oslon White 1 emitter creates a problem in the other direction - the beam would have a very thin low-CRI, cool-white, low-lumen beam. It wouldn’t be floody enough or bright enough for close-in use. And frankly it wouldn’t be that good for long-range use either as the reflector is too small.
  • Most small EDC lights with this size reflector use XPG-sized emitters such as XPL, XPG, XPL HI, SST-20, and LH351D. There are dozens of lights like this one with similar size and similar reflectors. Examples: Sofirn SP10B, Sofirn SC21, Skilhunt M150, Eagletac D25A and D3A, Lumintop Tool AA, Zebralight SC53w, etc.
  • Until this FW1AA, I can’t think of a single manufacturer who has chosen to use Oslon White 1 as their emitter in this type of light. And that’s likely because White 1 simply is not the optimum choice. Almost every light using White 1 tends to be a dedicated thrower with a large reflector, which this light definitely lacks.

And still no usb-c charging? Not for the new lep “antman” either so it seems. For me, that’s a no-buy.

Would pretty much have to redesign the entire light to make that happen and it would not be able to retain the basic characteristics that were the original hallmark of the FW design. They could do it, sure, with some added length to the host, but it’d be an entire new project. And actually I wonder if the width of the port + pocket to contain it and a rubber cover would be too much for such a small outside diameter…might need to fatten it up a bit to make it fit correctly.

Agreed.

Whole point of the FWAA series lights is to make them as small as possible. Adding a charging port would probably negate all the advantages of this light.

Small, pure, powerhouse, outstanding in its class. The fw1a was the farthest throwing light in its class. It redefined a class. Don’t dumb down the fw1aa and make it an also ran. It needs more throw than anything else in it’s size. You can have your usable spill when they make the pro model. Edit, let’s not forget that part of what made those first models popular was the choice of multiple LEDs.

Is this a figure of speech? I don’t understand it…?

Yes…“also ran” as in a second-place finisher or contenders far down the list of top placers, etc. Here are the top ten finishers in a marathon race, and then here’s the long list of “also ran” participants.