Yes, I wonder what made them make this one so different? The battery power of a 18350 is not that much higher, maybe the narrow space inside the Ant Man only fit a smaller less powerful laser? It runs at under 1A and gives off three times less light as the Thor I. And then going for an extra small 13.5mm lens does not help either.
Some calculations based on my (450kcd) 4Tool L10 : with the 400lm module of the 4Tool, a 13.5mm lens should throw 130kcd. If a 16mm lens was used in the Ant Man + a 400lm module, throw goes up to 180kcd.
Some things were likely not possible because of the size, but also some things were not engineered well enough by Lumintop.
What light is doing better after 4 minutes at 100, 200, 300 meters. Or if you’re in the field with a battery that’s down at 3.7 volts. I’m going to assume that the Ant-Man is not going to get too hot.
I’m not sure that this light perform well with a depleting battery, if it does not have a boost driver (as I expect sofar) the output will go down faster than the battery voltage, blue lasers work at higher voltage than blue leds. But I may be a bit fast with my conclusion, must do the runtime test first to be sure.
edit… If it’s drawing less than 1 amp it’s hard to imagine why the battery choice matters much. I think I would recommend trying to get an amp draw starting at 4.0 volts. What lights and batteries do for the first minute at 4.2 volts on batteries doesn’t help in the real world. Assuming everybody’s using flat tops?. Does it have springs on both ends?
I think Lumintop has introduced the 14500 LEP category, but done it with a bit of a loser. Other than looks. They’re setting themselves up to get really leapfrogged by someone with actually 400 lumens and a 16mm lens.
It’s a shame disassembly of these LEPs is prohibitive, I’d otherwise love to see it.