The There Are No Stupid Questions Thread

Remember that these aren’t rules anywhere, and just suggestions based on opinion.

Feel free to post as long or short as you want and as concise as you want to be, or not. Sidney might not read your longer posts but some of us have short attention spans.

Oh look! A butterfly

Huh? You endorse this repetitive posting?

I know there’s a few people that are really outspoken about it but it doesn’t really bother me either

Long posts should be no problem…evaluate whether it is information you need and then either read it or don’t.

CRC quoted post #1594 in its entirety – only to comment “Wow, thank you for all the valuable information and lvideo links.
Sorry for the late reply, and im only just seeing this now so I still have to check it all out…/”
(there are more of his responses but they get buried).

Then added Post #1601 xevious: “Another good channel is Afrotechmods…/”

Surely this could have been condensed in a smaller package without losing its response.

It is not the lengthy responses of the members that are at play, but the attachment of such to voice an opinion.

Take for example that last one. Could have been shortened to:
@ xevious: regarding Afrotechmods – Thanks for the video and channel suggestion…/

Now, I’m not condoning Correllux nor xevious’ posts, but the re-iteration and the mishmash that ensures.

Just a pragmatic observation.

Yeah, I don’t see an issue with this at all. Additionally, if one quotes a post, they are preserving a copy (in their own post history) whereas in theory the original posted could change or delete their post.

Especially if the quoted conversation is relevant to the post, since this forum software doesn’t provide links to the original quoted posts, it prevents having to scroll back (sometimes several pages) to read portions of the original conversation for context.

Today I reflowed a 219B to the Sofirn SC11 (4x AA). I also put in a spare FC12 LED and board into another SF11. It barely fits into the reflector and I was able to reuse the screws to hold it down. (Beginning’s luck) The beam looks about the same as the Wurkkos FC12. It works and has no problem so far on both SC11. I did a runtime on the 219B and when I realize the SC11 a 6V flashlight, isn’t it? I was using fresh 1.3v Eneloop and it ran for 60 mins to empty, the body heated up about the same as the S2+ with 219B. Does that mean it the 219B will work at ~5.2v for a while until the Eneloop drain to 4.8v steady for a while? Maybe I am in the clear?

Will I run into a problem with the SFT40? It works so far and it’s been running for 30 mins.

219b and SFT40 are 3V LEDs. The driver is a buck driver which reduces the voltage of the four cells (which are in series) to the forward voltage of the emitter. It should work fine as long as the combined voltage of the cells is > ~3V. So even if all four cells are almost dead (~0.9V) it should still be able to drive the LED just fine (as long as low voltage protection doesn’t kick in before that).

Hope I understood your question correctly.

Can LEP technology be used by a nation as a weapon?

I guess it could be use as a dazzler. Like a distraction or temporary blinding device. Other than that, I don’t think so. It wouldn’t really provide a huge tactical advantage to a nation state, unlike other devices like microbolometers (thermal cameras) which are regulated as weapons in some countries.

I am imagining a large one, perhaps installed in an artificial moon or a satellite that could be directed to an enemy state.

But why, though?

Sure, a laser could be used as a weapon. Not sure how much power you would need to do that from space, but why put a phosphor in front of it for weapons use? Doesn’t make any sense.

Drive people to kill each other with ugly green-tinted light?

Thanks for the explanation

I know Chinese New Year is generally a bad time to buy something directly from China. Does intl.outdoor.com do things differently being a smaller company, or does the same rule apply? (don’t expect anything you order now to ship till Feb.)

Oh? Doesn’t Chinese new year holidays start 31st of January? If so, they still might be able to send it out in time? A few days ago I placed several orders from several large Chinese vendors, in all cases orders where registered as shipped within two days.

Oh weird. I guess that Petrified Fish Store on Aliexpress gave me the wrong idea with their holiday notice.

I would assume they know their holidays better than I do! I only did a google search on Chinese new years holiday. The result on wikipedia of 16 days off is a lot different to that holiday notice 25 days on your AliExpress store.I guess it’s different from store to store, my AliExpress order was placed on 16th and got an email on the 17th that it was shipped.

If I apply just a little force to the FWAA MCPCB, it lights up at max. What could be the cause?