For the price I think it’s a great deal.
Love the even soft light.
On mine there are no screws on the top and I see on the photos on sale site at least some don’t appear to have screws.
Perhaps this version has a driver without the nasty PWM on low.
I’ve knocked mine around quite a bit and it’s still going strong - with a better battery.
Pulled the OEM battery apart and found the top and bottom had metal caps covering spot welds from wherever they pulled the batteries from.
I think the design is quite clever. Makes for a compact light.
If someone would make this with a 21700 down the middle and a better UI it could be a real winner.
Sell it for $20 a pop with a good battery. Or for $79.99 (as seen on TV).
All the Best,
Jeff
RC, Give it the finger wave test.
Wave a finger with the lamp as the only illumination (or the majority of the illumination).
Start slow and speed up the wave.
A light with no of fast PWM and all you see is a blurry finger.
A crappy PWM will show multiple fingers - and look like an old time movie with slow frame rate - All jerky.
Or take a pic with like a 1/4s or slower shutter speed. Wave the light fast as you can through the frame.
From an old POST from TK
Poor PWM will show multiple flashes. Faster PWM will show many more flashes.
No PWM will just be a blur.
Fans blades show this really well, Just watch the blades for effect seen in TKs images.
I did a video about camera shutters and PWM.
At 1:35 is my version of the camping lantern and it’s PWM
And at 6:52 you can see the Nitecore TUBE example and later the light waving in the camera view.
RC,
I hear you on the PWM, Ya’ can’t unsee stuff once you see it,
Feel free to use anything from my stuff. A credit would be nice.
But we are all here for fun after all. Well most of us anyway…
All the Best,
Jeff
I’m, unfortunately, one of those that is really bothered by visible PWM.
So I’ve spent a little effort into into finding out what is most bothersome.
What I’ve decided, is it’s the combination of PWM Freq. combined with the duty cycle.
Basically, it’s how long the light is off that makes the difference (mostly). There seems to be some point at which the off part of the cycle becomes too long and that fusses with my eyeballs and brain.
An RC, about using images from others. Copyright law is different for different uses. If the images are being used to generate money for yourself - that is usually a clear violation.
If the images are being used for editorial purposes - that is a different matter. Hence all the news sites with videos from all sort of sources.
But, naturally, you should do what makes you feel comfortable (I am captain obvious).
As RCs review is gone, let me repeat that at this price this is really a nice lamp. Wonderful diffused soft light - maybe 300+ ish Lumens with a good battery installed. The OEM battery is likely a pull from some older equipment or some old (old) stock.
The UI kinda sucks - Always High, Med, Low, Red, Blinkies, off.
All the Best,
Jeff
Quoting is the only situation that is generally OK all over the world (but sadly there are still many differences what exactly is allowed). Some states have “fair use” laws that allow to use copyrighted material in more cases. As I said previously in another thread, this is a very complicated topic…
Just looking at the link to the product shows up some questionable data. The light uses 24 white SMD 2835 LEDs and claims to use 20W. The typical draw for these LEDs is 0.24W per LED but that is for a 60 LED per meter strip using 12V. There is some loss in this strip by the small resistor that accompanies each three LEDs in the strip so it works on 12V DC. Even at 0.2W per LED the power consumption for 24 LEDs would be under 6W, nowhere near 20W. That’s actually pretty good as if this light actually did draw 20W, the run time would be very short between charges.
How bright is “bright”? Output for a typical 2835 LED is 1290 lumens for a 60 LED cool white 12V strip and 1200 lumens for warm white. 1290/60 = 21.5 lumens per LED Times 24 = 519 lumens. That’s about half what my budget CREE XML-T6 flashlight puts out on high setting. To answer siata94’s question, the Zanflare Z1 flashlight uses one CREE XML-L2 LED. The Zanfare listing shows the output to be 1240 lumens on high. This matches exactly the data in the CREE Data Sheet for the L2 LED.
It is probably a perfectly good light for the price. Just wish the seller would be a little more accurate with the specs.