That individual has an issue against Acebeam, he has been spamming any thread that mentions the X75. I requested that my thread be locked because of it.
We get it. You're an Imalent fan. There's no need to keep comparing Acebeam with Imalent over and over. When members feel like you're targeting a brand, your credibility goes down. If you're going to point out faults of flashlights, then please leave Imalent out of it and then elaborate on your statements.
The power function of the X75 is a bonus feature to me since I have dedicated power banks that are more portable than carrying a big flashlight. If I were to go somewhere that the X75 is needed, then I would not need to carry a dedicated power bank with me.
PS: I have the Imalent UT90, MR90 and LD70. Not an Imalent hater.
really, this might work on some other forum. but that`s hard to find newbies here at BLF. there is no chances to sell nonexistent advantages of proprietary charger to anyone here.
looks like really biased opinion. especially strange when it is against brand, that is really respected here.
What is your point? To prove that dust won’t stick on the greasy thread? You can open all your flashlights and expose their threads, you can easily review it yourself.
He used to time a factor of something 0.70 to 0.75, but to make X75 looks really good, this time he doesn’t times that factor. That’s why even his older Imalent MS18 hit 111k lumens, in the past, his MS18 OTF lumens didn’t hit that high. Flashlight output will only degrade year over year.
I also have a 20,000 mah graphene power bank with a 100 watt usb-c port and a 90 watt car Charger. I just have to decide how important 5000K is or if I should just get the 6500 one
Why would you not use the conversion factor if your meter / lumens tube requires a conversion factor, then proceed to call the non converted measurements “lumens?”
The lumen output at 30 seconds from the calibration lights is relatively low (e.g. 270 lumens) and I doubt the accuracy of a DIY lumen tube when it comes to integrating light from these big flooders with 50,000+ lumens. A sphere may be needed.
Did he use the lux values for comparing big flooders rather than lumens?