Finally got a DMM - HD2010 tailcap reading less than 2A?

Got my first DMM today ($10 Excel XL380L), and started checking voltage on all of my cells – mostly TrustFire Flames – and all tested right close to 4.2v.

Then I started learning how to get tailcap measurements. With the TF 18650, I get 1.5A on high in my SF L2 torches with the MF UF 3-mode XM-L drop-in. I think that’s about right, isn’t it?

After that, I tried to get a reading from my new HD2010. I read in reviews that it’s supposed to pull at least 2.5A on a fresh decent 18650, 3A on a higher-end 18650, and quite a bit higher on a 26650.

Mine gives me quite a bit less than 2A on high.

I thinking it is more likely that the stock leads on this cheap DMM are more likely the issue than my Trustfire Flames.

Thoughts?

Both readings are low. Most likely cause by thin leads. Make some new least from thicker copper wire.

Thank you. I thought so. I will do so. :slight_smile:

Yeah, bud, the MF 3 mode should give at least 3a so your 2010 is even more. Sounds like new leads are definitely in order. :wink:

Now I’m confusing myself. I found some slightly bigger leads from another better DMM I no longer have, and now I get higher readings, but still not as high as they should be. But like I said, my batteries are all showing 4+V. So if I can get a 3.5A reading from the HD2010 with a SolarForce 18650 charged to 4.2V, why can I still only get 2.5A on my MF 3-modes? Why wouldn’t I get ? Will the resistance in cheaper leads also cause variation like that?

I think I read that getting an accurate voltage measurement on cells is a lot more reliable than amps from a tailcap measurement when you have a cheaper DMM/leads. Is that correct?

Oh, and I have to make a quick edit. After changing the leads, I now get 3+ amps on the MF3-mode, but ONLY if I use the fully charged SF V3 18650. My TTFs just aren’t dishing out the goods. But still - my HD2010 should be getting much higher amps from that SF cell, I would think.

I’ll look for thicker leads, but I’m kinda worried I got an under-performing HD2010.

Crap. Now I gotta also add- i just checked one of the TFFs, and it was only at 4v. I’m definitely learning some things about measuring current at the tail. Need to make sure the cell is fully charged, eh?

Hopefully these leads are too thin as well, and just can’t register over 3.5A… Just read another HD2010 review (Foy’s) and he was pulling 4+ amps with the same SF cell I have on a 4.23v charge.

I’ll top these cells off and try again to see if I can get my 4+ out of this beast.

Then, when i get the 26650s it’s game-on.

Thanks again guys. At least this learning process is fun as hell…

If it’s any consolation, I only got 3.5 out of mine.

Good to hear, Jaffo
I’ve got a HD2010 and 26650s on the way, so have just made up some new leads as well…

Anxious to see the high amp reading, not that it’ll affect the torch output.
At least I’ll know whether a TFF or KingKong is better.
I’m betting on the KingKongs

I went through all this nonsense myself. The solution was custom leads:

Those are battery bars on the end of the wires (used in the construction of high current battery packs). If you know that those SF batteries are capable of putting out up to 5A or so, then you should be reading somewhere around 4.7A with the MF 3-mode drop-in. I don’t have a HD2010 so I can’t comment on that.

Good points. Thank you.

I don’t think I’ve read about anyone getting 5A from a SF 18650 on one of these - only with a good 26650. But, as Johnny Mac mentioned above - he got 3.5A with the TTF 18650s, as mentioned in his review. But Foy got 4+ with the same SF cells I have.

I think what we are experiencing is not just the DMM leads, which I expect to be part of the problem for me. Johnny and Foy test a LOT of lights, and we can’t blame any lower current results on cheap leads for them, I don’t think.

I think it’s li-ion cell variance, or worse, inconsistent East 092 driver draw.

Then again, the HD2010 is supposed to be direct drive on high. How would it’s draw be limited to anything under 5A in that case, unless the cells were to blame?

Am I thinking correctly here?

And thanks, Suncoaster! LOVE this torch, and it surely performs in the real world. But imagining an even brighter HD2010 with a good 26650 cell hitting 5A is a pretty fun as well. :slight_smile: Congrats on yours as well.

I ordered a pair of TFF 26650s, just because there seems to be no visually noticeable difference OTF. But the Kongs appear to be some awesome cells that I will have to order at some point…

I use Panasonic NCR18650A cells. With the UF-980L (which is direct drive on high) I get up to 5.8A out of them. Before I made the custom leads for my DMM, I couldn’t get a reading much above 3A.

EDIT: Just wanted to mention that this reading is with a battery hot off the charger.

And what DMM do you have, cainn?
A good and cheap way to check DMMs is using Nanjg driver (with good cells). If you get 2.78-2.79A - your DMM is good at lease up to 3A :bigsmile:

I have a cheap “Digitor” DMM. In addition to checking it’s measurements against known values below 3A, I’ve also hooked it up in line while doing discharge tests with my hobby charger. At 3, 4 and 5A it matched what my hobby charger was reporting to within 10-20 mA.

What you need to keep in mind is when your making your leads low resistance is the fact that your tailcap may not be. The only way to get accurate results would be to measure it through the tailcap.

That’s a good point, and I’ve been meaning to rig up a decent method of accurately taking that into account.

Just for my own clarification, “hot off the charger” means the cells have hit 4.2v, give or take, correct?

Are the TF flames from a trusted supplier and genuine?

+1 on the new leads as well.

Yep.

Give or take, yes. They’re always a tiny bit below that.