Review: Cyclone C88 from Int'l Outdoor Store

i really wonder if this is a new batch with defective drivers

Checked the Amp draw, for sure there's something wrong with my Cyclone:

High 1.07 A

Med 0.33 A

Low 0.05 A

Before someone ask it, my meter has thick cables and gold plated contacts, just for comparison my UF C8 SS with 105C driver measured 2.82A on high.

The test cell is a Trustfire 26650 5000mAh, which I measuerd in the HD2010 at the same time also, to be sure it's not the cell.

The HD2010 measured 3.9A high, 1.03 mid, 0.13 low.

At this point I can only think that the driver is defective.

I will write to Intl.Outd. to explain the problem.

Will keep you informed.

@ BORT:

Did you hear anybody else having same problem?

No one else, we may have orders from a newer batch since its been a while since this review, but my reply from hank is not confidence inspiring

I cannot believe so many people are getting bad Cyclones. Seriously . . . 1.07 amp? Mine pulls over 2.80 intitially and settles down to around 2.75 and is bright as heck. You need to get a refund or exchange and after as long as it has been, Hank needs to get ahead of this.

I strongly recommend and then everybody gets a lame light. I'm lovin' that, for sure.

Foy

Yeah I'm pretty sure it's a driver issue.

I repeated the test with different cells

I got 2 KingKong INR26650 and one Trustfire 26650 5000mAh, and all them gave exactly those same numbers, 1.07-0.33-0.05A

The C88 hotspot at 3m on wall has same brightness as the HD2010 on med level. No strange as HD2010 measured 3.9-1.03-0.13 on same cells.

I wrote to Hank in PM here and will wrote him on his store too, then will wait a few days for an answer. I understand he could be busy or away for a few days.

I just hope I don't have to swap the driver by myself, because I've read that the pill is pressed in and mine is firmly pressed, I could not move at all by hand. Don't want to rush and ruin it.

Foy don't be embittered, you reviewed what you had in your hands. I see the full potential of this light is as you described, the beamshot shape and size are really good, the assembly and finish are good too. If one or few or some are "defective" due to a bad set of drivers, I can not really blame the seller. I don't think Hank (or Ric or any of those small sellers we know) has a QC line to test all flashlight are exactly per spec before packaging.

Hank is a stand-up seller, for sure. Foy has spent many pesos at IO and no doubt, will spend too much more. Rusty Joe had problems with his quite some time ago and the replacement he received wasn't much better, according to him. I've mentioned this a couple of times but a while back, I commented in somebody else's thread about my then new Shadow TC6 pulling 1.80 amps at the tail instead of the advertised 2.5. This was before I wrote the review and because I was so happy with the light (still am) I chose not to make an issue about .70 +/- amp.

The next day I get a PM from Hank saying he was sorry I received the "wrong head" and would send another right away. Upon arrival, he said he would arrange for me to send the old head back. I got the new head a week later and it pulls a fairly steady 2.50 amps. I PM'd Hank, I had received the new head and to please advise re; shipping back the old one. That was 5-9-12 and I still have both heads.

I think the Cyclone is an important flashlight and worthy the kind of support I received on the TC6.

Foy

I received PM a few days ago about another Cyclone with issues. I wonder how many people have failed Cyclones?

Foy

Any news regarding how these issues were taken care of?

Happy to report that after a "brain transplant" (A.. B.. someone... LOL!! Marty Feldman in Young Frankestein) now my Cyclone is finally up to its name.

After sending to Hank a short video with comparison and Amp measuring with other nanjig105 equipped lights, he agreed that the driver was defective, and asked me if I was able to replace the driver so he could send me a replacement driver. I agreed and started disassembling the light. With the freeze and torch trick the pill came off easily and with a bit of prying with small screwdrivers finally i leveraged the old driver out of the pill. Not very easy, really, as it appeared to have been cyanoed in place and the brass ring come out also, little warped.

Anyway the brass ring was easily straightened (should I say rounded again?).

I'm still waiting the replacement driver to arrive, but I also had one ordered months ago so installed that one.

This was my first soldering a driver, wow those things are so small I had to buy a new tiny point for my soldering gun, but ended soldering very easy and clean.

Now my Cyclone measure a steady 2,8A on high, 0,86 on med and 0,15 on low and output is definitely up to expectations!

This thing can throw! Nice and clean hotspot. But there's no match with the HD2010. That's in another league. The reflector size difference is obvious, a HD2010 ain't pocketable at all, but the Cyclone can still fit in a large jacket pocket. Nice portable thrower

Cool, thanks!
I wonder whats the total number of affected Cyclones?

veer -

I would like to know that too.

Foy

Hello i`am new to BLF i like the look of this torch thinking of buying this torch will it be safe to and no issues

taff

Depends, are you planning on using a 26650 or AAs? AAs are very safe and 26650 can be dangerous.

I was planning to use 26650 ( dangerous ? )

taff

Li-ion batteries can be dangerous if you use cheap batteries or cheap chargers. You also have to be willing to measure their voltage to keep them healthy. My personal recommnedation would be a Trustfire 5000 mah protected 26650 from CNQualityGoods along with an intellicharge I4.

Thank-you for that

Any news on current batches of these? Are they still having issues? How many are affected?

This looks like an interesting flashlight, especially considering the price, and I would buy one if it hadn’t been for the recent issues some have had with it. I would like to stick with AA’s, so I would be interested in what is the estimated output in lumens on high with 3 Eneloops compared to that obtained by using the lithium battery, which I assume is used to get the 910 lumens output.

You and me both bro

You and me both bro

It appears only slightly dimmer than with lithium’s. I get 1.85 amps on fresh Enloops and 2.81 amps with King Kongs.