@Shaquille
I fail to understand the need to attack this light or my review of it, but I'd like to try to answer to some of points you brought up.
First of all, I didn't get this light for free. I paid the normal pre-order / introductory price, and i think Slewflash did the same for the light he reviewed.
1. T6 & output
As Slewflash pointed out, an U2 CW version is available. It was my own decision to go for T6 NW instead of U2 CW. The output is lower, but the tint is more important in my planned usage.
Over four times the throw of Skyray King is very impressive to me.
2. Battery carrier
I think the battery carrier is very high quality. Upside down springs look funny, but they work really good when inserting the batteries. I would take this carrier over the Fenix carrier (or the linked DIY carrier) any day.
3. Emitter mounting & Thermal paste
I agree that the thermal paste around emitter stars doesn't look good, but I'll explain how this has happened: The emitters are pressed against the heat sink by the aluminum reflector, which is tightened with the screw through the heat sink. So, during the manufacturing, some thermal paste is applied under the stars, after which the reflector is tightened so that the all extra paste comes out (as we know, less paste equals better thermal transfer)
This can be thought to be sloppy job, but it results in good thermal characteristics, as can be seen in the thermal graph.
4. Only Panasonics are good up to 3.5A
Not exactly true. Panasonics are good cells, but there are others that can be used too. I use XTAR 18700 2600mAh, which are based on Sanyo cells, and can easily provide 3.6A / cell. Even some cheaper cells can do this.
5. AR coating
I agree. This light would deserve an AR coated lens. I'll upgrade it with one if I manage to find a suitable one.
Final words:
I'm sorry if the review or light itself wasn't good enough for you, but I tried my best to describe what I think of the light and why. After all, I'm still very happy with this light.