Longer throw without changing the driver !! :) Prototype is done and now it's time for testing.. ( more beam shots)

[scaru]

Beamshots are coming. :D

[DayLighter]

dang … you guys made me go outside in the cold just to satisfy your argument…anyway i’m curious also…
so here’s the shot… still using Trustfire wf 502b, distance to the back wall is about 80’
control shot

before (no hotspot… as Trustfire WF-502b is a flooder)

After ( hotspot!)

[scaru]

Ok, so preliminary tests on the wall make lit look like the fresnel lens increases throw...

Before

After

So quite impressive to say the least!

Ok, so let's take it outside.

Before

After

That's pretty conclusive! For anyone who thinks otherwise here a mouseover is. Mouse over for before; mouse off for after.

So ma_sha was definitely right!

[scaru]

And yes, camera settings were not changed.

[ma_sha1]

Thanks for the hard work Scaru :exmark:

[scaru]

@NZ Shooter

@ma_sha1

@NZ Shooter

What Da F**k ?? :~ You just urinated on your own argument - you haven’t been out with the very torch this post is about, nor have you seen it up close and personal. Maybe you need the full picture before drawing a conclusion???

Watch your language, I don’t expect a person with potty mouth to know what elephant is by looking at pictures after pictures of it’s tail. However, plenty of people does not need to see the said elephant up close & personal to know it’s not a rope. There is no doubt that spot is much brighter on the wall, it’s the conclusion of more throw that’s being questioned. Where is Dr. Jones when we need him?

Get bent fella. You brought up the dam elephant subject. Not me. How do feel now ??? The pictures just posted fairly conclusivley show you jumped the gun on a conclusion, and were +WRONG+

Actually, they show fairly conclusively he was right. You wanna go look at my pictures again...

[scaru]

@scaru

Mouse over for before; mouse off for after.

So ma_sha was definitely right!

Cough cough cough!!! It is a much better thrower with out the lens, this could not be clearer.

[scaru]

@NZ Shooter

@ma_sha1

Because it’s no longer a parallel beam, The OP needs to take it outside & compare the actual throw, i.e. the distance that light can actually reach, actual distance the light can reach vs, before the mod, it’ll be obvious that the throw will be less

I must be on planet Mars. The ‘after’ shots show a tighter beam. Less flood more throw. How can ma_sha be right ?

It is tighter, that is correct. But the amount of light down range is less. It isn't as bright=less lux.

[scaru]

Ok, here one is with it cropped so it is just the hotspot. Mouse over for before, mouse off for after.

So which one is better lit up?

[citamul1]

First time poster here. I just had to join up after seeing this. This is a great thread guys! I’m sure glad I found this place. It’s really interesting!

[scaru]

@NZ Shooter

@scaru

@NZ Shooter

@ma_sha1

Because it’s no longer a parallel beam, The OP needs to take it outside & compare the actual throw, i.e. the distance that light can actually reach, actual distance the light can reach vs, before the mod, it’ll be obvious that the throw will be less

I must be on planet Mars. The ‘after’ shots show a tighter beam. Less flood more throw. How can ma_sha be right ?

It is tighter, that is correct. But the amount of light down range is less. It isn't as bright=less lux.

Okay. So I’m looking at Daylighters’ beamshots. There is no way the ‘before’ shot will out-throw the ‘after’ shot - surely. Even in the alley way it looks like it would easily.

Look at my shots, these were taken on full manual mounted on a tripod. I know these are accurate.

@scaru

Ok, here one is with it cropped so it is just the hotspot. Mouse over for before, mouse off for after.

[NightCrawl]

Even the hotspot is not brighter.. also, I clearly see a donut hole.

The pics of DayLighter are misleading, different exposure and aperture (hope thats the right vocabular)..

And, NZ Shooter, please watch your language. I noticed that quite often recently.

[DayLighter]

scaru… are you using the same light as i have?.. there’s no way that trustfire WF 502b have a hotspot like that.
unless it was shot within 10” away
try shooting it farther… like my distance around 80’
by then you’ll see Trustfire wf 502b will no longer have hotspot anymore.
all of you that think otherwise… judge it by yourself… take a simple test,get a magnifying glass and point the light to the middle of it… depending the size of the flashlight… hold it between 8” to 13” and see it for yourself.
and feel free to take it outside and see for yourself… please note this mod won’t work well with multiple LEDs
then come back over here on this thread and let’s compare shots
i’m pretty sure it can throw farther than that 80’ distance

[DayLighter]

same point and shoot camera… just resize it to upload it better…take the challenge for yourself before you accuse someone of misleading

[scaru]

@DayLighter

scaru… are you using the same light as i have?.. there’s no way that trustfire WF 502b have a hotspot like that. unless it was shot within 10" away try shooting it farther… like my distance around 80’ by then you’ll see Trustfire wf 502b will no longer have hotspot anymore. all of you that think otherwise… judge it by yourself… take a simple test,get a magnifying glass and point the light to the middle of it… depending the size of the flashlight… hold it between 8" to 13" and see it for yourself. and feel free to take it outside and see for yourself… please note this mod won’t work well with multiple LEDs then come back over here on this thread and let’s compare shots i’m pretty sure it can throw farther than that 80’ distance

It's a TK35 clone, but the concept is the same. I did exactly as you suggested and got some quite clear cut results. I'll add these were taken at approximately 50 feet.

[scaru]

@DayLighter

same point and shoot camera… just resize it to upload it better…take the challenge for yourself before you accuse someone of misleading

Daylight, a point and shoot does not have the same exposure settings each time. It has a computer chip that decides how to set the exposures. On my camera I set the exposures to the same standard Brad, trooplewis, and Rick use and both shots were from the same exact position.

And I have taken the challenge myself, now that I have done it and got conclusive results it is proven. One can easily disprove a theory (like I did) but it is extremely hard to prove it.

[citamul1]

Wouldn’t it settle this once and for all if these shots were taken from a lot further than 80 feet since both versions can reach that distance easily?

I think if this were taken at 300 yards instead of only 80 feet and then measured with a camera that should clearly show which way throws further.

[scaru]

No matter what this light won't throw 300 yards, my STL-V2 couldn't do that. If you guys would like I will get out and take some at 100 yards tomorrow night. (Its 1 am here)

[NightCrawl]

@DayLighter

same point and shoot camera… just resize it to upload it better…take the challenge for yourself before you accuse someone of misleading

I dont accuse, I state a fact.

[scaru]

@NightCrawl

@DayLighter

same point and shoot camera… just resize it to upload it better…take the challenge for yourself before you accuse someone of misleading

I dont accuse, I state a fact.

A proven fact.