A Perfect Dedome?

Thought it sounded to good to be true, ahh well you saved me $27.

Did you really get a UV emitter by removing the phosphor layer? I thought the tint you get was blue, can you make things fluorescence like a passport or driver license?

This raises the questionā€¦ā€œwhy do they put domes on the LEDs in the first place?ā€

Ooops! My mod'ed T08's start at 95 - 100 kcd. I meant fully mod'ed with dome (4.2A nanjg, XM-L2/SinkPAD, copper, UCL/p lens), then after de-doming this highly mod'ed light... Sorry I didn't make that clear. These are all true numbers, verified after the de-doming by another BLF'er on his well published throw measurements (https://budgetlightforum.com/t/-/18214), but only after the modding .

Yeah I ground mine off too and it still wont tail stand very well so like you no mods for me either.

LOL!! :smiley:

Well, my A3 DOES tailstand at least! (I used wire cutters and sandpaper) ā€¦then blackened with a Sharpieā€¦some real high tech stuff, Iā€™m mighty proudā€¦ :nerd_face:

Makes much more sense now!

I have an actual UV light (but only 3x 3mm LEDs) for A/C leak detection, and this one with phosphor scraped off looks the same, except about 300 times brighter. Maybe the tint is a little more blue than purple but it's still putting out TONS in the UV range. Even 'blue' LEDs have a lot of UV in them and glowy stuff will glow enough to be noticeable, but this one is fierce. I'm not using it again until I have some proper protective glasses, even though I of course never looked directly at the emitter just looking at things it was pointed at left me with purple shadows in my vision for several hours afterwards.

Unlike the original XML, XML2 isn't damaged by scraping the top of the die, it's just a flat featureless slab of ceramic(?) with no traces to be damaged. Doing the same to a XML would have killed it.

Also, your eyes are not very sensitive to blue light and your iris wonā€™t close downā€¦ you get hit with a LOT more light than you thinkā€¦

Interesting ideas... I'll check if I got mineral or baby oil and give it a go. Got at least 20 of XML T6's laying around now, so good for experimentation.

I got a couple of Defiant 2AA lights @ Home Depot last night. Is there any point in dedoming? It would throw better and the tint would warm up, right? I believe itā€™s an XB-D emitterā€¦? It would be a cheap experiment anywayā€¦let me know what you think!!

Anyone?

I canā€™t say Iā€™d recommend 2x14500 in a 2xAA light. Sounds bad for the emitter to me.
As for dedoming, Iā€™ve never tried one of these tiny emitters. I have an XB-D kicking around somewhere.

I like mineā€¦for what they are. Used one as a bike light tonight. It was ok but the batteries rattled a bit. Cat Eyesā€¦youā€™re a ā€˜bad boyā€™ā€¦taking those back after abusing them with 14500s!! :wink:

Kind of blurry, but the best I can do with my old DSLR. It doesnā€™t do well over 400 ISO and I need a macro lens.

Hereā€™s a picture of a dedomed stock XML2 from a TN31 (by TomE himself).

One of you hotrodders who like to put in 3A drivers might try filling the space around the emitter with some liquid like mineral oil or ideally freon. You canā€™t use anything with water in it because it hydrolyzes at around 3V. Even a high boiling liquid will expand enough when hot to circulate and carry away heat. A reflector light or a non-zooming planoconvex aspheric should work perfectly well full of oil from front to back. It may even cut down internal reflections.
One of the most beautiful things I have ever seen was a running Cray II computer. It sat in an aquarium full of freon, and little streams of tiny bubbles were coming up from the components.
I expect manufacturers will do something like that at some point when they get the intensity up to where heat is the main limitation, maybe by filling a hollow dome with fluid.

Heat's always an issue, even with doctor's illuminated head gear when they are doing 4+ hour operations - this is relatively low amps, but strapped to someone's head it's not pleasant when it warms up. Weight is an issue too, so guess it depends on how much liquid. I know of at least one crazy intense bike light custom built that used water, I believe, for cooling - I think the emitters were mounted on an aluminum plate, then the cooling system acted on the aluminum plate from the other side.

3 amps is still stock to me - custom, we are talking 3.5A on up, maybe up to 5 amps in regular builds for single emitters.

I attempted a de-dome of an XM-L U2 that was installed in a small light, itā€™s direct drive with no driver so I dunked the entire head in gasoline. But, with the wife and kid wanting to go to the lake I got in a hurry. I removed the dome at 4 hours and broke 2 of 3 wires.

I figured, with nothing to lose, why not try this weird black liquid solder from Radio Shack that I bought mistakenly as glue? Itā€™s electrically conductive, so why not?

And with that, I saved a de-dome! :slight_smile:

Looks awesome too in this really small light! :slight_smile:

Mind you, Iā€™m not experienced at this kind of stuff. So if I can do itā€¦.

Water-cooled flashlights :)! They do that nowadays with PCs/CPUs, with heatsink/contact piece contacting the CPU and then a pump that moves the fluid to another part that has a radiator and fan(s).

I suppose he had to keep the water away from the contacts. Water is a great coolant in the temperature range in which it is liquid, but not for bare electric wires. Some oil is a better insulator than air, and there are low viscosity and low boiling point fluids that are good insulators too. There might be something oil would dissolve, like the insulation on the wires or glue.