Should not the XP-G2 be labeled (3000K), like the XM-L2?
The XP-G2 is in the E7 group, which is probably the same group as the 3000K XM-L2 (if not Z7). Or am I missing something.
I’m sure he’d appreciate the extra run time, not to mention the extra throw would help make this his new light that he can use for everything.
What does everybody else think? A 52 year old man who likes fish, fishing and the occasional yard work would an EA4 suit him better, or an EA8? Right now he’s using a silly incan handheld spotlight which has laughable output, but serious throw to lumen ratio. I’m leaning more towards the EA8 since it has more throw.
We just received some info on the SRT3 and SRT 5. Both flashlights will contain red+blue LEDs. The SRT3 will be able to take a single (R)CR123 or AA/14500/LifePO4 with an extension tube. The SRT 5 will use 2 x (R)CR123 or 1 x 18650. We're looking at max outputs of 550 and 750 lumens for each respective flashlight.
We're looking for someone to do a test/review of these direct thermal copper XM-L2 U2 1Cs, normally I'd just pick someone but I'm short on time today so either recommend yourself or someone else and convince me of your ability to do a comprehensive and fair overview. Thanks in advance for your help guys!
Me Me!
I recommend Tom E too as we can compare our results.
I already have several of your emitters on copper to compare with. Generally my test results seem to compare to others.
I would have recommended match, but I was under the impression he has ‘retired’ from testing emitters. That status might have changed since his last few posts though.