Overview: All Eneloop batteries 2005-2024

eneloop related stuff :bigsmile:

The UOMOs I have are numbered, but you still confuse them if you have more than 1 pack

Aren't they only numbered 1-4?

I don't know since the batteries are in use and I gave a bunch away to my cousin, but I found one numbered number 5...

That's interesting. I don't have any uomo batts, so can't check.

But I thought that uomo and rouge are also sold in 4`s, and are not 8 different wrappers, so I assumed they were my numbered 1-4 only.

My 4th gen eneloops arrived (thanks ChibiM)

Just quick phone pics, excuse the bad lighting.

That’s correct… 1-4 and 1-4 in both UOMO and Rogue (8 in a pack, so there’s two identical sets).

Thanks for confirming Strick9!

Hi I bought a five pack of eneloop AAAs(8,66€), because I had no AAAs rechargeables.
After charging I have done a discharge test with B6 and at 1A until 0.9V I get around 600mAh
I haven’t tested all and not multiple times but I am confused a bit…

Is this a average result? I am confused because I counted with 700mAh…

Werner, what are your actual readings?

Please do another discharge, and at 500mah or even 250, to see what you'll get.

HKJ seems to not have tested any AAA eneloops.

Capacities are based on a 0.2C discharge, after a 16 hour charge at a rate of 0.1C. Under these conditions, all the AAA Eneloops I have tested (16 in total) exceed 800mAh.

Cheers

I need 4 batteries for my marine VHF. I was looking at eneloop XX (newest gen), but then I found a review which stated that the XX have a slightly less voltage than the regular ones. My original battery is 6.0 volts, in any case I can’t achieve that with NiMh batteries.
Now I’m wondering, should I go for the slightly higher voltage regular eneloops, or should I choose the XX with their less voltage but 25% more capacity and almost twice the price? What do you think?

I would suggest you check the curves in my AA comparison (they basically have the same voltage).

Thanks, I guess the other graph I saw was not entirely accurate.

Edit:

Perhaps my i4 is not perfect for loading the AAA, I have charged one with my hobby charger and capacity was above 700 this time

I now let one discharge with 200mA which I had charged up with my i4.

I will charge the other 4 over night with another charger.

Yes, very strange graph. I don't trust that to be accurate at all

What do they mean with original? First gen?

Even first gen had more than that after sitting 3 years unused!

Seems that my i4 isn’t able to charge them properly, strange as my experience with AAs said that all cells were charged nice with it…

I have done a 5cycle test with my B6 with 0.6A charge 5min rest 1A discharge and I got continuously 720mAh out of this torture…so the cells seem to be in good condition.

Sorry, because I am stupid I confused the chocolate ones with UOMOs. The UOMOS are indeed only 1-4. Sorry for the confusion.

Not much more info on the blog it’s from:
http://www.ae5x.com/blog/2012/02/10/three-generations-of-sanyo-eneloops-compared/

I actually asked the poster to delete the graph, because it looks deceiving.

But he didn't do it.

The batteries are measured Not after they were charged, like the XX.

So who knows how long they have been laying unused, or even used.

Or even coming straight out of the package. Eneloop doesn't charge them Full.

So it's better to delete the graph, so people don't take it as proof, for whatever reason, because it's not!!!!

WhY I said earlier. If you leave a first gen. untouched after a full charge it will have almost more mah. left after 3 years than this test.

And it doesn't sho the discharge current. Not even mentioning it's done the same current with all of them.

Don't trust that graph.