As long as its related to the L4 or modding (the L4), its all good! :)
If putting a 7135 based driver in there I would just strip the stock driver, except the switch.. A little part of the nanjg needs to sit over the switch. Saying that there is good space in there might have been an exaggeration, but its space..
Thanks. Hope I don't type too much.. :p
No change in efficiency before/after mod. Input amps=output amps on this driver.
The reason why my last tailcap reading were slightly lower than the emitter amps was probably just because of the connection or something. Emitter amps is a more precise way to measure amps despite that there is a little bit of loss in my wires/connections.
Oh boy, you’ve made me struggle. I am going to order one of those good quality “C8 format” lights and I’m struggling in between the XinTD C8 and this Convoy L4. The XinTD seems to have better and more solid overall built (screw-in reflector, driver with retaining ring…) BUT it doesn’t has side switch, while this L4 is only fall short on its water resistivity due to its side switch. What should I do? What should I do?!
EDIT: The driver in the XinTD C8 does not has retaining ring with it, but soldered onto the pill, my bad.
Johnny - what exactly did you figure out for the elctronic switch? I'm looking to find out how the port I/O is mapped to read the star solder pts. Think it's Port 15 (B) I believe. Haven't started testing it though.
I have always recommended the Xintd despite not owning it. Like you say, its a well built light, good parts, screw in reflector, AR lens, Qlite and with mode options, tint options. Its a great light!
IMO L4 does have a few advantages though.
Aluminium body > brass screw in pill
Copper mcpcb which are tightly secured by screws > screw in reflector
Dual switch setup with electronic side switch > tail clicky only
Qlite vs LD-34-A. That is subjective, but the L4 is a tad more "sophisticated" (not sure if its got any sort of low voltage protection or warning yet, which I would prefer).
Buy an AR lens for the L4 and its still cheaper (depending on where you buy and what emitter option)
Looks are subjective, but id say the L4 looks way nicer. See them side by side here.
L4 is shorter.
L4 can easily be modded for higher output as well, its actually easier to add a resistor or two to it than to stack several 7135s onto a Qlite.
Im probably biased towards the L4 though, but its a reason why I bought that instead of the Xintd. So far it have lived up to my expectations.
cool… another light for resistor mod :heart_eyes: I love this light… it is beautiful light, I don’t care much about the waterproof part, because I don’t plan to stay outside when it’s rain
I mentioned the Vf right below where you quoted me. I see nothing wrong with the way the driver regulates.. There does not seem to be much resistance in it either. :) (tested same used NCR18650B in the L4 and in a light using Qlite and XM-L2. I saw a higher tailcap reading on the L4. Again, probably due to the lower Vf in the emitter)
The change in amps are due to the Vf issues in the emitters, not in the driver. Regulation is good as far as I have seen.
:beer:
btw, no one have actually confirmed that the switch is a weak point for rain...
Ohhh - thanx Jonny!! Was wondering bout that, if Tidos' original had support for it. Didn't seem documented in the code clearly, not sure. I looked at it...
I’ve got .12R, .22R, and .5R resistors on the way… Any idea on a possible combination to score in the 4-5A range? I’m currently seeing about 2.7 on unprotected panny NCR18650B 3400mAh.