BTU Shocker Triple MT-G2 with a twist -- Aiming for >100Watt ~9000Lumens -- With external 2S power pack, handle etc...

Flashlight Modding and DIY Parts
108

Thanks Richard, working on the modified battery holder and power delivery system at the moment and it’s taking longer than expected to get everything right. Needs to be able to deliver ~20A through a twisting contact interface to the driver contact board as well as provide a twisty contact for the trigger switch circuit. It’s fiddlier than I thought it would be but I think I finally have something that will do the job.

Still waiting on the small rail to mount the handle properly to the battery tube. The first one I ordered from ebay never arrived and the reordered one from DX is taking it’s sweet time to get here as well. That’s the biggest obstacle for getting this thing finished by the end of the month, provided my modified battery carrier/power delivery setup survives the full power test in it’s current form anyway. :stuck_out_tongue:

109

Boy … you are creating a monster!

congratulations! truly a wonderful job! :slight_smile:

When you turn on the T-REX, I see it from Italy! hahha

What a Zener diode, you have to buy to replace?
Wow!

110

The zener I used is a standard 4.3v 0.5W one, not the surface mount version although those will work too. The key thing is that the voltage to power the MCU is kept below 6v and since a fully charged single cell delivers max 4.2v the 4.3v zeners are very close to the ideal. Anything in that range will work fine though.

Here’s where I got mine.
Zener 4.3v ebay

111

112

Haha! :bigsmile:

113

Ok, It’s been a while but I’m finally making progress on this build again.

I’ve finally been able to retire the cable ties and assemble the proper handle mount!

This tiny rail part took the longest to get here and it was the first I ordered…:frowning:
Original Ebay order went missing and had to reorder it from DX which took another month to get here, of course it also looks like a dog chewed on one end before it went to anodizing but hey you can’t have everything can you :stuck_out_tongue:

Anyway I wasn’t going to let this part hold up the build any longer, the battery tube is drilled and tapped and the mini rail is bolted firmly in place with brass M4 bolts.
At least the dodgy end isn’t visible when assembled :slight_smile:

Very pleased with the handle now, it’s a fair bit lower to the light body than with the temporary mount and while I got used to that setup, this is just about ideal.
Haven’t tried it with the reflector in yet but balance shouldn’t be much different to before so that should also be fine.

—

Next progress update is on the internals. These have been holding me up as well, but more due to their complexity than any missing parts.
The main problem was in transfering close to 20 amps through a turning interface contact to the driver electronics in the head, and doing it with as little contact resistance as possible.

This is what I’ve come up with…it’s still a WIP and haven’t tested it at the full current load but I’m pretty sure it will do the job nicely


This is the reworked battery carrier, the xlr socket is firmly bolted to the tailcap case and the carrier assembly has been cut out and sunk around it then hotglued in place.
I also split the boards up to add one in the middle and increase the torsional stiffness of the assembly a bit.

On the top I have 4 contact posts, these are made of fairly stout flashlight springs from cnqualitygoods and each one is heavily beefed up with copper wire to maximize conductance. The springs aren’t really very springy anymore but that’s how it should be, it just needs to make a tight press fit against the contact board without being too rigid and breaking anything off while being tightened.

I have 3 springs/posts for the battery neg and 1 central one for battery positive.
This central one is even more heavily reinforced with copper wire and soldered to the top is a brass cylinder which will make the contact. It will also act as a registration and centering pin for the whole assembly.

Currently they’re wrapped in shrinkwrap to avoid any potential shorting issues due to bent springs, but I’ll probably go a bit further and glue a short plastic ring around the base of each post just to make sure nothing can jump across and short.

On the opposite side I’ve reflowed a 20mm contact board to a copper wire extension so it could be clamped into the stock driver retaining ring, then soldered another brass cylinder into the central hole with a small depth offset to which the main battery positive wire for the driver is connected.
The small cylindrical recess created in the center offers a registration/centering point for the battery positive contact post as well as hopefully a good tight contact surface.

You can see the polish/wear marks from the negative posts on the aluminium edges of the contact board, I’ve tested the tightening of the assembly over 50 times while working on this thing and it’s doing very well. You can hear the click as the “centering pin” battery positive post engages with the contact board and then it tightens smoothly but with a healthy pressure resistance all the way up to the end of the threads.

The final part to this twisty puzzle was how I would complete the circuit for the clicky trigger switch in the handle. This needs to deliver or interrupt the power going to the MCU side of the driver and therefore needs it’s own contact post/surface combination on the contact board.

My current approach for this…and it’s not done/working very well yet… is using a spring loaded little contact post on the battery carrier side (made from a cheap 3x AAA battery carrier) and a circular copper contact surface made from a pcb board material on the contact board side. At the moment the contact surface is just too wide and interfering with the battery neg posts but I can probably work it down some more. It’s also a bit too thick so might need to find some thinner pcb board material or try something else…

An alternative that might be simpler is to go with a magnetic reed switch approach, tiny reed switch glued to the outside edge of the contact board or even behind the contact board? And a coil connected to the trigger clicky on the battery carrier, positioned where I have the spring loaded contact point assembly at the moment…

…so if anyone has any thoughts on if/how best that could work here please let me know. I don’t know enough about reed switches and coils to know if I would even be able to generate a sufficient magnetic field in this type of setup.

In any case I’ll do some load testing of this setup soon and if that passes without a fire I’ll finally move on to installing the critical components! :slight_smile:

—

A simple test assembly has convinced me that I need to at least drill a registration pin hole into that damn reflector and add a pin to the emitter shelf so that it doesn’t all twist when assembling the head. I also need to add some handles or something onto the reflector so I can lower it into the head precisely without fear of dropping that damn thing on the emitters! Not to mention aligning and drilling the emitter wire holes and potentially pcb screw holes will take a lot of patience…

I also have my copper spacers to heatsink into the reflector done and waiting but that’s another variable that needs to be accounted for when laying out and assembling it all…this whole part should be a lot of fun if I prepare it all properly…but I’ll also be really glad to see the end of it for sure!! :stuck_out_tongue:

Cheers

114

Have you thought about just running enough length of heavy gauge wire to absorb the twisting of the tailcap on, and then having everything solidly connected with no sliding? I know length of wire increases resistance, but you’re already using that phone cord to connect the battery to the light, a little more length of wire wouldn’t hurt, right?

Alternatively, why not use small springs to suspend copper rings? That is, have a smaller copper ring mounted on springs at your existing + connection points, and then have a thinner, wider ring around the edge similarly supported by springs for the negative connection? Solid electrical path into the copper rings, you have enough give that the rings would press 100% into the contact rings on the underside of the board.

115

Wowsa. One word only to describe your light at this point. Sexy.

116

Fair point but I’m already at my limit of resistance losses that I’m willing to accept because of the phone cord. Hard wiring everything would have been a lot simpler alright and I was planning to do it this way initially but twisting up heavy wires isn’t really an ideal solution. I kinda cringe whenever I have to twist up even small emitter wires on lights so I don’t think I could have forced myself to go with this solution :slight_smile:

I’ll see when I run some full load tests, will measure the voltage drop across the carrier and contact plate to see what I’m actually losing in terms of resistance. I suspect it may be less that I think even with this setup, at least I hope so. :slight_smile:
If it’s not ideal them something like your copper ring contact plates may be an option, although that sounds even more fiddly.

117

That’s fair. It doesn’t seem fiddly in my mind, but then again I’m crazy. The other concern I have is maintaining the contact layers. Even if those springs end in rounded blolbs of solder, I imagine it’s still a good bit of pressure pushing them into the contact rings, and I remember some SRK-clone reviewed her, the person said that the gold plating on the + ring was wearing off alarmingly fast from the battery + poles rubbing the surface. I just thought that it would be less wear and tear. But then again, as I’m typing this, I realized that you’ll probably have to screw this in only a few times, and then only if something bad happens to the driver. :slight_smile:

118

What you need is some sort of relay.

This'd provide an alternate current path than through your button switch.

Something like this Omron 12VDC 16A. The current loss for the relay is a lot less than what you'd lose through the long thin wires of your coil if you were to direct current that switch.

119

Yeah it’s more a set and forget type of thing, but you’re right the last thing I’d want is to worry about damaging something when doing maintenance or tweaking the driver.
It’s another reason why I felt I had to maintain the twisty interface to the driver though, so I can easily get to the components in the head and not have to worry about desoldering the main supply wires each time.
With regard to the contact surfaces wearing away on the contact board, the positive contact is basically a brass cylinder to a brass cylinder so that won’t really wear and the neg contacts are rounded solder + copper wire pressed against mostly the aluminium of the contact board holder itself, and only partially to the contact board edges.
If the board wears down much more than it has up to this point I’d be very surprised, but even if it wears away the ground ring on the board it’s not a problem.
I’m more concerned about the area around the positive contact point wearing down and opening up till it no longer functions as a registration and centering socket. It’s already a bit rounded from my earlier botched attempts are alignment and spacing. :stuck_out_tongue:

Are you talking about the coil for the reed switch? I didn’t think I would need that much current to generate the magnetic field for close range operation!? :open_mouth:

Or do you mean for providing power to the drivers/led?
If that’s the case, no current powering the leds will go anywhere other than directly from the battery pack through those contact posts and into the led and linear driver circuit. Batt+ goes directly to the emitter + from the contact board and batt /ground goes to the ground pin/ring on the 7135 slave boards which in turn connect to the emitter.

The only thing that the trigger clicky will be doing is providing power to the Atmel master board so it can turn the 7135s on and off as required. Those will then switch and regulate the <18A to the emitters directly.
But for that to work I need to tap off a positive source from the carrier, run it out to the trigger clicky switch and back (through the coiled wire you can see) then somehow bring that circuit back to the mcu which will be housed in the head, that’s why I need to go through a third contact interface in the contact board.

For clarity on the driver/emitter side I’m basically doing exactly this…

OR

I could keep the two circuits separate, one inside the head tacking battery positive from the center contact point and feed it through a reed switch to power the mcu, and a second circuit in the carrier with an electromagnetic coil connected to the carrier sources and switched by the trigger clicky. Then, in my mind at least, when the trigger clicky is active it generates a magnetic field in the coil which turns the reed switch on in the head and powers the mcu on, click it off and everything shuts off again.
With this I wouldn’t have to worry about having a third direct contact point on the interface but I’m not sure what kind of reed switch and coil combination would work for this type of thing. What kind of range I can switch over and so on…or indeed if this is feasible/sensible at all.

Do you have any experience with reed switches and electromagnetic coils? Would really help me out :slight_smile:
It was just a thought since I wasn’t relishing the idea of going in and sanding down that copper contact disk and making that approach work…

120

Love that video; “You cannot be awesome without this rifle” :smiley:

Back to the thread, Hold Sweet Mother of God, now that is a Shocker! Mine is relegated to a box in the corner as of late. I still like it, but I have other lights that get more use due to form-factor.

121

Hehe… not surprised by that, the shocker is a club of a light.

Thanks for ressurecting the thread and giving me a kick to get back to this project, got a bit distracted over the holidays with simpler mods.
Time to finish this one off and finally see it throw some photons!

ps. Oh and I found a pair of these motherboard auxiliary blowers a while back and am thinking of making a bracket for them that can be attached to the BTU so they can blow some air over those heatsink fins. They’re just the right width and it looks kinda cool with a pair of these blowers hanging off each side of the light.
Don’t know how much it would actually help to keep things cooler but they do move a decent amount of air even at ~8v. Worth giving it a go anyway i think.

122

I am anxiously awaiting! I still think this is an awesome project.

123

+1 I’m sure others are too. Please show some video as well.

124

I hope this project hasn’t died in the ass, any updates?

125

we still await the news…

126

i sure hope not. i really liked where this was heading.
has anyone else added a handle and switch to their shocker like this one?

127

i have not added a handle to my Shocker, ( not yet) but did on my SR90, ( a little different style handle.