Review: UV light shootout, seven lights tested

If it’s from Newport, forget about it… unless you are a very stupid Bill Gates… as in Billionaire Gates. Figure $400 each…

I got the drop-in the other day and put it in an L2P with 2 extension tubes, running 4 18500 lap pulls in it. Very low visible light, but very strong UV. Can’t see it in a beam profile more than a few feet away, but in a dark room it will flouresce virtually anything in the room. Haven’t tried currency yet, but diamonds really show their stuff! And the emitters, yeah the MT-G2 is awesome looking at a bright reddish orange! Gotta be careful not to flash the UV back at yourself though. :wink:

How important is it to run that high a voltage? Would be much more convenient to have a smaller light, but if it needs that kind of power to really work then I’ll leave it set up as it is.

Thanks again!

forget Newport, different technology, no doubt $uperior (sigh) but not for $400

The Rosco UV-pass filter costs $8 to $16 from a lot of photography stores.

So — does anyone make a flashlight that takes a P60 dropin, and has a 2” (50.8mm) lens/reflector diameter??
Or know of step-up rings that would put a 2” photography filter on a flashlight?

Threads. Drive. Me. Crazy.
Seems like machinists have more different kinds of threads than quiltmakers!

Hmm, anyone tried the new Nitecore UV light?
<a href=“http://illuminationsupply.com/chameleon-series-c-c-28_53_127/nitecore-chameleon-cu6-xpg2-440-lumens-ultraviolet-365nm-1-x-18650-2-x-cr123a-p-950.html”/a>Illumination Supply has the Chameleon CU6 on special right now and it claims to have a 365nm LED.

Just curious. I doubt it would compare to a multi-hundred-dollar dedicated UV light, but it’s nice that it’s useful for general-purpose lighting instead of just UV. Low-power red/green/blue emitters, a “3 watt” UV emitter, and the XP-G2 we’re all familiar with, in one package. I’m hoping someone will review it soon. :slight_smile:

I wish manufacturers would say which UV LED is used (brand, model, etc.) as we are always told of “Cree” as a selling point. >.<

I have found that even with current U.S. currency bills . . .

the dyes used are excited better at different nm wavelengths.

LarryDFW

“… remote control monitoring stations up/downwind or stream from suspected polluters and collecting evidence over many months to find patterns of releases to the environment that a single inspection would probably miss (Already missed typically…).”

Thank you.

Ah after looking at this thread, do we have a group buy going to for the TK-566?!
I want one!

Does it even need a group buy?

I’m debating whether to go with the KD P60 or the TK566. I like the longer runtime on the KD but the compactness of the TK566 is much more desirable.

Would love to get your opinions as to why you picked the TK566.

Which one did you buy? what is the difference between the TK556 3W 365nm or 395nm?
Is the nichia better?

I don’t think either are Nichia UV’s. The 365 is better but it depends what you want to use it for. The 3W has two emitters I think. There was an image of the emitters but need to go look for it.

Hmm… I’m planning to buy it for the same purpose of checking currency and random stuff like lighting up glow in the dark stuff.
Is this a good place to buy it?

http://www.manafont.com/product_info.php/tank007-tk566-haiii-365nm-money-note-watermark-detective-uv-light-1aa2aa-p-4435

I got the KD P60 and set up my light with extension tubes running 4 18500 cells. Then I got to studying and started taking some measurements. One 18650 gave .31A, where 4 18500’s gave .07A. So the single cell was actually running more power. I don’t need it to run 6 weeks on one charge, so single cell it is! :slight_smile: (yes, I know, 6 weeks was an exaggeration to prove a point) Very neat light, like it a lot. Thanks for the recommendation.

Single cell was drawing more power, but most likely not delivering to the LEDs due to driver efficiency issues.

It’s brighter on one cell than 4, or 3 or 2. Deceptive, as there’s not much visible light but it causes reactions in materials from further away. Materials like white objects, like urine, like diamonds…

On 4 brand new Kinoko 18500 high discharge cells it pulls .07A at the tail, just now. On one well rested and partially used Sanyo UR18650FJ lap pull it does .31A at the tail. In my lightbox, the 4 cells show up as .01 with no multiplier used. The single Sanyo shows .02. Much easier to see a stain in carpet for instance, with one cell from waist high, versus the 4 cells, where handholding at the waist barely shows the floor.

And it’s a single LED, not LED’s.

Interesting photo. I am usually use to seeing the LED’s as greenish in color. This is very different.

ri chevy, it was pointed out in this thread that the UV light causes the phosphor to fluoresce different colors dependant on their tint bins. So you get a different result if the tint is cool white vs warm white. Cool whites like 1A tint bins don’t actually do much and still have that yellow/green look but duller, warm tint’s like the one above go orange! The warmer the more orange, so it actually does help to identify which tint bins you have with the UV light.

Just this morning I was looking to put an XM-L2 U2 1A in gas for de-doming. I had an unmarked emitter on a Noctigon, and a marked 1A bare in a bag. What tint is the mounted one? Side by side they look identical. But I didn’t want a greenish cast to my light with the de-domed emitter, so I got the UV light out. The bare emitter glowed brighter, highlighter yellow, so I knew it was the one to go with! :slight_smile: The other is probably a 3C, had that dullish yellow/green look to it.

The light above is, I think, an XP-G2 R5 2B. My big MT-G2 lights also glow orange, and are supposed to be 5000K in temperature. :wink:

Cool. I did not realize that. Thank you for the explanation. I am still waiting for a triple UV drop in. :beer:

That’s where I’d go.

I had thought that the number of cells only increased the run time and that on one cell it needed to boost the voltage slightly and more two or more cells would buck, but then

I wonder if there has been a change in the driver?

The P60 approach seems promising, especially if it performs well on a single 18650. However, I’m still trying to find a review of the Nitecore CU6, because it sounds like it could potentially be a fairly nice UV light. The most detail I’ve found is that it pulls about 3W (~0.8A, or ~2.6X as much as the P60?) from the battery and produces about 1W of light at 365nm. I’ve found no actual reviews though, or personal tests to show how well it works compared to other lights.

The r/g/b and white modes would just be an extra bonus, making it useful for more than a single purpose.