Comparison: Budget LED Light Bulbs

Over the past few months, I've been picking up the odd budget LED light bulbs via different sources.

From left-to-right: Standard 14W (60W equiv.)CFL bulb, eBay purchased 6W LED bulb, MF purchased 4W warm bulb in GU10 base and E27 bases, MF-purchased 3W warm bulb, DX purchased cool SMD bulb, and eBay purchased cool bulb.

A bit about each bulb:

eBay purchased 6W LED bulb: I purchased a pair of these bulbs. They are rated 6W. They each contain 22 warm white 5050 SMDs. They give a light that is slightly green, but not unpleasantly so. When looking at the emitters directly, you notice a bit of 60Hz flicker, but it's not normally noticed in the room. On one of the bulbs I purchased, half of the emitters cut out when the bulb gets warm. I disassembled the bulb, and found that there are two circuits of series-connected LEDs driven from the same output on the driver. Apparently, there is a bad component in one of these circuits. I haven't found any bad traces/solder joints. I am currently using these bulbs for porch lights, and they work well for that, with the exception of the defective bulb.

Manafont purchased 4W bulbs in GU10 and E27 base (http://www.manafont.com/product_info.php/gu10-41w-4w-360lumen-warm-white-led-light-bulb-85v265v-ac-p-6415 and http://www.manafont.com/product_info.php/e27-41w-4w-360lumen-warm-white-led-light-bulb-85v265v-ac-p-6416):

These are essentially the same bulbs, only with different bases. They are rated at 4W, and each has 4 warm-white emitters and a TIR optic designed for a five-emitter lamp. These seem to be rather well built, and the aluminum heat sinks do a very good job of transferring heat away from the emitters. These emit a very pleasing tint of light, focused in a beam too narrow for room illumination, but well suited for spot and accent lighting. Unfortunately, I dropped one of these bulbs on the floor, and it wouldn't light afterward. I disassembled the bulb and noted a single surface-mount capacitor missing. I felt it fall through my fingers, but was never able to find the component to repair this bulb. I am very happy with these lamps and would recommend them to anyone who needs a cool-running, high-efficiency spot/accent type lamp. I have had four of these bulbs in a kitchen light fixture where they have been used for two months now with no failures or issues. Here is one disassembled showing the construction:

Manafont-purchased 3W bulb (http://www.manafont.com/product_info.php/e27-31w-3w-270lumen-warm-white-light-bulb-lamp-silver-85v265v-ac-p-7145):

I purchased two of these bulbs from Manafont. They are labled as 'Uniquefire'. They emit a pleasant tint of light, but are only bright enough for a desk lamp for very basic illumination. If I were using it as a work lamp at a desk, it would not be enough light for detailed work. Of the two bulbs I received, one was well assembled, while the second did not have the LED assembly secured to the heat sink. It is supposed to be glued with a gray 'Fujik'-type of compound, but it was not attached. The diffuser results in a wider area of light, but it's still too directional to use in a tabletop lamp with a shade. I wouldn't recommend these lights unless it suited a particular application you have in mind and are willing to double-check your bulbs.

DX cool-white SMD bulb (http://www.dealextreme.com/p/e27-3w-18-smd-5050-led-white-light-bulb-110v-47795):

I purchased three of these cool-white bulbs from DX. They each have 18 5050 SMDs and are rated at three watts. These lights are very dim. They have a very cool tint with a wide area of illumination, but are too dim for general use. Even when used in a desk lamp, they do not have sufficient brightness to properly illuminate a work area. I am currently using them in a ceiling fan fixture in my computer room where they provide enough light to navigate within the room, but not enough to actually do any work. These would possibly be well suited for accent lighting in a home theater type of room as they emit such a soft and subdued light.

The eBay Special:

I purchased a pair of these lights from a HK dealer on eBay. They were listed for $1 each with ~$4 shipping. I accidentally purchased them in an E14 base, so I was then forced to purchase a pair of E14-to-E27 adaptors which was rather dissappointing. They each have 108 cool-white emitters. These lights are quite easily the worst of the lot. Even though I purchased the pair together, they were shipped separately, and each bulb was labled differently. One was labled as AC230V-50Hz @ 5W while the second is listed as AC110-240V 50-60Hz @ 3W, but both bulbs emit the same amount of light when used. These lights are EXTREMELY dim and are essentially worthless for any application I can think of.

Here are some light-comparison shots. The first shot is a control shot using the CFL bulb, with manual settings on the camera and white balance set using this bulb. All subsequent shots were made with the same settings. The green/blue tints are not NEARLY as noticeable through the eye; these shots show the tint as exagerated by the white balance setting of the camera. The do however show the overall brightness levels of these bulbs.

  • Standard 14W (60W equiv.)CFL bulb
  • eBay purchased 6W LED bulb
  • MF purchased 4W warm bulb in GU10 base and E27 bases
  • MF-purchased 3W warm bulb
  • DX purchased cool SMD bulb
  • eBay 'special'

CFL - control shot

4X LED spot

3x warm

5050 SMD

ebay special

patiently , sooooo patiently

EDIT: WELL THAT WAS WORTH the wait . very nice pics n review

frankly the tech is limited by the form factor of the E27, id love a step by step tutorial with common parts. even if it doesnt fit in a regular socket.

keltex, do you feel that 5050's are in general a decent solution for desk lamps? I'm thinking of getting a bulb for desklamp that I have which uses illumination from one side of the bulb (so an axially symetrical design wouldn't work), and wonder if they sting the eyes if looked into directly, etc, all the little things that can't think of without actually using one.

Something like: http://cgi.ebay.com/E27-44SMD-5050-LED-11W-PL-Light-Lamp-Warm-White-85-265V-/230645267894?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item35b3877db6

Thanks.

The 5050 emitters are definitely blinding when you look directly at the emitters. Here's a side emitting bulb available on Manafont that may be suited to your desk lamp; the first is a 5W and the second is a 8W:

http://www.manafont.com/product_info.php/e27-51w-450lumen-white-light-85v265v-ac-p-7152

http://www.manafont.com/product_info.php/e27-81w-720lumen-white-light-85v265v-ac-p-7153

I can't recommend either of these bulbs as I don't own them, but I like the fact that they have a diffuser to soften the light.

I wonder what's inside those. The specs seem a bit bare since it doesn't reference emitters or temp. I assume it's cool white since it doesn't say "yellow".

Thanks for the review. Look like CFL still has the edge for now.

Hi there keltex, thanks very much for this informative comparison! I've been waiting for somebody to post such a comparison, because I want to get into LED light bulbs. Very well done, thanks for the comparison shots. Frontpage'd and Sticky'd.

So far, it looks like many LED bulbs might not meet my needs. I prefer a very warm colored, very bright 100W equivalent. And I need pure flood, like a regular incandescent bulb provides. I currently use 26W CFLs rated at 1700 lumens by GE, which I like very much. But I'd obviously like to drastically reduce the power usage if possible, since electricity is extremely expensive where I live.

A 100W equivalent bulb is going to be ~20W equivalent in led's, or 2-3 xml's, though you can get away w/ less in led's if directional application is applicable. I supposed you can ask for a warm white version of the 3 xml skyray. Ceiling bouncing that thing is like turning on 150w bulb.

I guess I wouldn't save much on electricity then. 26W for my 100W equivalent CFLs.

Yeah, CFL is actually really efficient. Less flexible packaging than Led's, so they're really more complementary technologies for now.

Nice review!

Thanks for the review! I'm searching for a led bulb and this comparison is really helpful!

Hugely useful post and review. Thanks so much. Sounds like many of the LED lightbulbs still fall a little short for now.

It does however, tempt me to stop at Menard's this weekend and pick up one of these on sale:

http://menards.inserts2online.com/breakout.jsp?referrer=imagemap&imageName=b781123_19.jpg&isBreakoutImage=true&pageNumber=14&breakoutName=b781123_19.jpg&itemId=&showAsPage=true

Thanks4OP. Pretty much confirms what I suspect every time I see "4 watts" -- common sense will tell you it'll be as or probably less bright than one of those cheap 3 x AA "3 watt" headlamps with no-name emitters. Any decent LED bulb will need to be, what, 10 watts min, pref 17+.

DX has some interesting high-wattage large-surface bare LED's, like 20+ watts. They seem easy enough to hook to a computer heat sink and power with a regular DC power supply. However I've not seen anyone do that, just people torture-testing Cree's is as close as I see on that. No idea why we don't see these at market as a finished product? Even in wal-mart now I see these 4-watt pieces of shame. That's not acting in good faith in my opinion, as 4 watts by any means is not going to be much more than a night-light.

I think maybe we see Match's next project? The [multi?] XM-L "X-Lamp Lamp'? Seriously, how much would a well-made single Cree XM-L semi-directional/lower output light bulb really cost? I think going from AC to DC would be the hardest part, even beyond heatsinking? An XM-L die wholesale costs maybe, what--$5 wholesale or less? KD has 'em on a star for $8 shipped.

At this point the demand is so high and supply so low, yet bare parts available, I think someone could make at least decent side money cobbling such things together by hand, possibly a living like Nailbende, selling them on Ebay, shows/conventions, FORUMS, etc..

Some of the "higher" wattage ones at Wal-Mart (like 8? LOL) seem to have fans in them! I'm not sure, it's hard to tell. But I am NOT going to buy a bulb which makes noise of its own! Which is why I won't buy CFL--not (necessarily) audible noise (that too, sometimes), but they produce just TONS of electromagnetic garbage/noise. In fact that's how they produce the light in the first place. Put a handheld AM radio up near a CF bulb when they're both on and you'll hear the sound of death.

I'm really hoping that CF will be the "Windows Vista" of lighting technology: touted as the greatest next technology, horrible but some will love it just because it's supposedly great, only around for a short time, and in the end, not a replacement for the older technology... Replaced by something less bad, yet not a complete replacement solution for the old technology. LED will probably be the "Windows 7" of light: what CFL was always supposed to be but never was, still bloated (LED's are ridiculous expensive on the front end compared to incan), not great (LED's have a hard time producing the riciculous light an incan can), but not the bad dream the last "leapfrog" technology was. CFL's will hopefully be analagous to the zeppelins of the past: not the first flying technology, and replaced by simply better versions of a previously-developed technology.

So much energy and resources go into CFL's, some argue that they are not a net energy saver over their lifetime. Esp if they break a lot sooner than advertised, which is my own experience. That's why they cost so much: much more energy and environmental cost goes into producing them, vs incan's which are very lean on resources used. Same reason hybrids cost more than a comparable vehicle. To save $5 to $15 on electricity, that bulb will need to be used a lot, and last a long time.

Plus, CFL's can be very dangerous, and fail catastrophically at unpredictable moments. Had it happen to me, and have read worse stories of them breaking unexpectedly and spewing fiery plasma until turned off (not to mention the mercury). Just 1 whole-room carpet replacement for spilled mercury covers enough resources for a lot of incan light bulbs and electricity to power them for a LONG time. I now won't leave the home with a CFL running.

Personally, I'm stocking up on 100-watt incandescent light bulbs (30 cents apiece!) as in the USA, national socialists are trying to ban them. If nothing replaces CFL, I'll have to be a renegade and get DX to try to sneak my contraband incans past customs. Maybe I'll be arrested on a streetcorner trying to buy 100 grams of incandescents, or get my car towed when they find a few during another surrepetitious search. A woman can 'choose' to have an abhortion [sic] on demand and kll her own healthy, consensually-generated human offspring, but it's not our 'right' to 'choose' which light bulb we use? Wake up, this is the wisdom and ethics of Leftism.

From the looks of this Comparison, it unfortunately looks like LED replacement for incans is quite aways away.

thanks for sharing so patient, glad to here that especially for the different channels of getting them. pictures shows there is just for testing or have any ideas of creating the atmosphere...,

Plus, CFL's can be very dangerous, and fail catastrophically at unpredictable moments. Had it happen to me, and have read worse stories of them breaking unexpectedly and spewing fiery plasma until turned off (not to mention the mercury). Just 1 whole-room carpet replacement for spilled mercury covers enough resources for a lot of incan light bulbs and electricity to power them for a LONG time. I now won't leave the home with a CFL running.

Uh, the reason they can create that plasma is due to vacuum in the tube, and the trace amounts of mercury they contain aren't even enough to alarm those communist socialists in the EPA. http://www.epa.gov/cfl/cflcleanup.html

Thanks a lot

It's definitely a help, since a lot of us were/are thinking in using these bulbs!

Have you noticed:

Now, that incans get banned people are getting VERY concerned about CFL´s containing mercury.

Have any of you noticed any debate before this? I mean, like 95% (at least at here) of schools, daycares, hospitals, libraries, stores, supermarkets, offices have had CFL-tubes as main source of light for how long, from 70´s?

Nobody at least in here has bothered to take sweat to get these banned for last 40yrs...

Ok, CFL´s have mercury. If I remember correctly, it was some 5-6mg tops.

If a bulb breaks, how can you assure yourself, you can get it all into your system? You have to be under it with mouth open and inhale fast & keep it there to maximise dosage.

After succesfully absorbing it, you may have gotten a part of this 5-6mg to your body.

BTW, do you eat fish?

Have you ever been worried about the amount of mercury in fish meat?

A couple of times in a week was enough to get you almost the same as from one CFL if you eat fish, that has the highest approved limit for consumption. Correct me if I remember incorrectly.

Yes, a lot people are good with names and bad with numbers/quantity. Not a problem if you're careful but sometime it's used to their detriment in propaganda.