Understanding the difference between Linear, Buck, Boost and Direct Drive drivers

There is also a power and temperature limit on the 7135 chip and this is usual reached way before the 6 volt limit. Luckily the chip will protect itself and just reduce the current when it gets to hot.

Basically you are wasting the power of one AA battery into the driver. Not the most efficient solution but it should work as long as the driver doesnā€™t overheat.
If you want to reduce heat losses you could use a dummy AA cell to reduce the voltage a bit. That would make your light a 3xAA light. :slight_smile:
The light should be as bright. Maybe that it will start reducing current a bit earlier at the end of discharge though. 7135 chips start reducing current about 0.2V above the LED voltage.

Same sorta issue here, referring to disadvantages of linear drivers:

You said above that the 7135 canā€™t take over 6v, but if the cells in series add up to 6v or less, couldnā€™t you use them? Iā€™m thinking of Cr123, NimH, and alkaline cells, and there are lots of others. I suggest adding the designation Li-Ion thusly: ā€¦multiple Li-Ion cells in series. (I would also change ā€œbatteriesā€ to ā€œcellsā€ to be correct in terminology.)

Yes you can (Note CR123 are 3.2 volt).

Another thing to note when using the 7135 chip is that it is the chip that is limited to 6 volt, not the supply voltage for the circuit. This is used in some clever circuits that runs at higher voltage but uses a 7135 chip.

Just an FYI 4s NiMH is 5.3v fully charged.

Thank you HKJ. The more I read the posts here in BLF, the more I realize that there are so much more to learn. :slight_smile:

Noted lagman and thanks for this info. If only we can buy a similar driver (I tried but theyā€™re not selling) then it would be much simpler.

Oops! So its still safe on the 4 NiMH, right? Or should I follow lagmanā€™s suggestion of using 3x NiMH instead.

But if the chip automatically reduces the current when it gets hot then there should be no problem right? :frowning:

4xNiMH starts at about 5.8 volt, but will very soon drop to around 5 volt (Depending on load).

Here is my test of some NiMH batteries:

HKJ Iā€™m not at all doubting any info you post but I have a light (pukelight v1) that uses 2 parallel strings of 4s NiMH and it runs at 5.3v fresh off the charger, dead theyā€™re around 5.1v, why the difference?

I have multiple 4s AA lights (and the one 2s4s) running 7135 based drivers and they all work perfectly and have yet to overheat.

That sound like the charger is undercharging the batteries or maybe they rest a long time before you measure them.

I assume you measure the final voltage without any load on the batteries, that will be higher than loaded voltage.

You might not see that they overheat, it is very difficult to see if the brightness drops 30% and when you add a ammeter you add some extra resistance, i.e. the voltage to the 7135 will be lower with less risk of overheating.

The risk of overheating depends on the number of 7135 places close to each other and their contact to a heatsink (I.e. flashlight body).

what i would like to know is the difficulty in creating a single li-ion boost driver for single high Vf emitters (xp-g2, xm-l2 etc). i know the discussions with lightmalls fell through. what could have been the technical causes? large drop out, low efficiency?

Something like this: http://lygte-info.dk/review/DriverTest%201A%202.7-5.5V%20Buck-Boost%20UK.html

thanks hkj. i know buck-boosts like this are available. of course i mean i would like to know the inherent problems of a boost driver for to meet Vf at high current (>4A). i see your reviewed driver regulated well at 1A, and that boost mode was more inefficient than buck mode.

It is no problem to make a boost or buck driver, but combining to a buck/boost is a problem. There exist only a few chips that can do it.

The problem is that you basically need two switchers sharing one inductor, this requires multiple transistors. As long as all the transistors are in a chip it is fine, but a led driver does not have place for external transistors for higher power.

a mass market driver with boost should be buck+boost, and i can understand the complexities of such drivers. good explanation also! but the driver in dicussion with lightmalls would have been boost only (DD at Vin>Vf). in other words, a specialised driver for lights which can withstand DDing an emitter (i.e. 5A+).

at high current would a boost driver never reach the required efficiency to work from a single li-ion? or something else, like lack of commercial ics? i canā€™t even find any mass produced step-up voltage converters for this range and output.

I agree, I changed the OP accordingly. Thanks! :slight_smile:

Buck-Boost drivers are also less efficient than just a Buck.
If he wants to drive a XM-L2 at 4A or more he should consider having two Li-Ion cells in series to get 7.4V and using a buck converterā€¦ However it will be bulky to be able to withstand 4A.