Tricky, Yourrid! The $2 should be subtracted from the $27 to make $25. The manager initially receives $30. He then gives $3 back, $1 to each man. He now has $27 because he kept the extra $2 that he should have given them, but didn’t because of uneven/awkward distribution.
Correct. You have won one government certified “attaboy”. You can pick up your certificate at the Ministry of Silly Walks, Attaboy Division. For a slight fee, you can be upgraded to an “attaperson”, which is the politically correct variant. Just show a copy of this thread at the counter.
Just transpose/simplify. My father’s son must be me as I have no brother’s and sisters. Therefore it becomes this man’s father is me. Therefore the picture must be of his son.
As it turns out I had a dispute about this long ago and phoned MENSA. They got it wrong (Amazing). It was only after I suggested they transpose/simplify that they agreed it has to be his son.
This man….let’s say this is me…his father (my father) has a son. (Me again) My father’s son (Me again)
It cannot be this man’s son, as the man in question (This man in the this man’s father equation) is the son of my father. The brothers and sisters I have none part merely indicates there are no options for other kids being the answer. My father has a son. Me. My father’s son is me. period. end of story. And truly, my father has one natural born son. So, who is my father’s son? Me.
The question doesn’t ask “Who am I?” The identity of the speaker, or riddler if you will, is of no importance. “The picture must be of his son” makes no sense in relation to the question, as there was no “picture” in the question.
If you study the question as posed you will note the term ‘this man’. Plainly the riddler is referring or pointing to someone. OK it could be a real person but usually in this riddle it refers to a picture. However, the big clue is that the riddle is being spoken by someone and at the end the riddle is asking who is this man rather than who am I. I suppose riddler might be pointing to himself and talking of himself in the third person but that is so unlikely a possibility that we must logically ignore it.
Let’s say we have a photograph/picture (Brit-speak for conceptualized image) of 3 men, grandfather on the left, father center, and grandson on the right.
The father, explaining the relationship to a third party, points to the son and says “this man’s father (himself) is my father’s (grandfather) son.
I value the community we have here to discuss POV’s as we do.
Just to lighten the load as the previously debated riddle always causes arguments. here are a couple of short ones.
A) Two fathers and two sons go to the lake. They each catch a fish. They bring them home and put the three fish on the table. Why are there only three fish?
B) I have a basket with four apples in it. I give an apple each to my four children but there remains one apple in the basket. How can this be?
A) There are three men, just as in the “previously debated riddle”. One is the father of another, who is the father of another. So, one is both a father and a son.
B) I’m just guessing, but I think maybe you started out with an apple in your hand (not in the basket)?