thats quick shipping but the shipping to australia is about the same $$$ as the torch and i normaly only order 1 at a time, ive used manafont about 10 times now, im happy with there customer service, they are in the same time zone as me so i can use the live help if i need questions answered and the respond quick to emails and the batteries i get from there are gen,s
i have read all the threads i could find on the fry rays lucky as i almost brought me and my old man one each, but i whent for the TrustFire TR-3T6 lucky and the reports comming through on some of the new sky rays tripples are not much better i made a post here so if any one has read the sky ray threads and then read this thread it should be clear witch is better, well i think so.
I have that light purchased from the same place you mentioned (Manafont). On the lux meter, on 3-cell operation as well as 2-cell operation, the light output is exactly the same. For regulated lights, it's much better to rely on the lux meter.
It's the same thing except w/ an extra metal tube extension.
Also, I'm not sure why we're blaming Sky Ray (or MF) here. They just rebrand the same stuff that Fandyfire does. That means next light from them could be good, or crap.
I have the original version of the skyray. My son loves that light and beats it like rented mule. Can’t tell you how many times it has shut down from getting too hot. It comes back every time after a few minutes. I am actually very impressed with it’s durability. I’m sure there are a lot more out there still kicking like mine, just don’t hear about them.
im not sure it they are the same thing, the manufacturer claims the 2 cell version is regulated at 2.5 amps and the 3 cell version of the light is regulated at 3 amps
but i gues there is many factor,s in this, the torch its self, the user, the cells used and how its measured and if the ddm leads have been moded to give false higher readings, the lux meter would be the proof as already stated.
but i stand by my comment that the 3 cell is more versitile and it will provide longer run time between charging but the extra two extention tube,s will cost you and extra 30 cents so since its only 30 cents more and it gives you the option of 2 or 3 cell use and a claimed 0.5 amp more regulation i would go for the 3 cell version even if there is no diffrence to the regulation, its 30 cents..
ive been very happy with manafont service over the firt 10 orders
im not sure it they are the same thing, the manufacturer claims the 2 cell version is regulated at 2.5 amps and the 3 cell version of the light is regulated at 3 amps
I think if there's one thing we've learned here on this forum, it's that manufacturer specs are largely arbitrary. Here it really makes no sense at all to make two different versions.
You talking about the SR and TF triples? Definitely they are different, i mean different drivers (if that's what the majority of the concerns are) as someone has taken the guys. Also different drive levels. Eg, SR3800 is 160 lux reflected bounce, TF-3T6 is 130 lux reflected bounce. The trustfire also has a wee bit tighter spot, just a wee wee bit....when i A-B them on a white wall a couple of metres away. Not sure how that translates to throw lux though....never bothered to measure. heh...
Definitely buy the 3-cell trustfire! Then you can use the extension for Direct Driving the SR3800 when the driver Poofs! Hehe... :D (yes, for other's general info, the Trustfire tubes fits the Sky Ray, no issue and that's what i am doing now)
I'm a bit addicted to triple XM-Ls. Luckily the Jetbeam RRT-3 XM-L is like 400 bucks.
I mean the "2cell" and "3cell" Trustfires. For some reason they have different current spec even though we figure it's the same thing but with an extra extension for the latter.
I'm just saying it's nothing out of the ordinary for HK vendors and their sources. The original versions were better, and soon as demand rose quality dropped.