With my collection of 16340 getting a little on the old side ( half a decade ) , I decided it was time to buy some new batteries . Trolling ebay I came across the Efest batteries , and I thought , why not ! The following chart is a 0.5A discharge , the two batteries were each charged and discharged three times .
After the 0.5A discharge , I put each battery through a 1A discharge resulting in :
Batt 1 - 511mAh
Batt 2 - 527mAh
And then I decided to try a 0.2A discharge :
Batt 1 - 494mAh
Batt 2 - 498mAh
Then it was time for a discharge test for current capability , and using one of my hot little 16340 XM-L mods :
Batt 1 - 1.63A
Batt 2 - 1.85A
Nitecore 16340 - 1.35A
AW 16340 - 1.4A
Solarforce 16340 - 1.54A
Lets see , the batteries are obviously not well matched , so if you plan on using them in a dual battery set up , you may wish to buy more to find a pair that matches Capacity and current a lot closer than this pair . ( Just saying ) In a single battery light , this disparity in performance is not an issue as both outperformed the other batteries by quite a margin .
Also note the battery has printed on it 700mAh Capacity ? Why would they want to do that , it just means the batteries are around 25% shy of claimed capacity ! If only they had 550mAh or something printed on the label , I could say bravo for trying to be honest . Unfortunately this tendency to exaggerate capacity on the label of the battery is getting out of hand , and to see what is supposedly a reputable company (?) getting on the " Lets print what we want on the label " bandwagon , is not a good sign at all .
For single battery applications , these batteries might be worth while looking at , but from this sample pair , I would not recommend them for Multi battery applications unless the user was prepared to test and match the batteries .
So :
Not well matched
Capacity 25% shy of claims
Outperform other 16340
No protection circuit ( a + for me )
Just over 500mAh capacity ( Average for 16340 )