BTU Shocker.. A review for the layman. ( Nightshots, Hotspot shots w TK70 )

I know there are many wonderful reviews of this light. For fun, I thought I would do one for the less technically proficient. Many of these reviews contain highly skilled people doing down to the thousands of a inch measurements. DMM’s, Lumen meters, alien probes and assorted brain busting conclusions. Yeah, this won’t be like that.
Upon receiving my BTU, the first thing you notice is the weight. It is a HEAVY flashlight. Some reviews I saw put it at around three pounds. But that’s too involved for me. It’s HEAVY, end of assessment.

As you can see it’s a hunk of metal. To me the beauty is in the simplicity. There are no magnetic rings or anything of that nature. For the technically challenged. The BTU breaks down into four parts. The head, Barrel, Tailcap, & Battery carriage.

The head

The Barrel & Tailcap

The Battery Carriage

Here are a few ‘Hot Spot’ Shots at 3 Feet. It has 4 levels ( Cycled thru by pressing the Clicky)

  1. 80 lumens
  2. 600 lumens
  3. 2000 lumens
  4. Turbo 3000 lumens

80 lumens

600 lumens

2000 lumens

Turbo 3000 lumens

My conclusion of the BTU Shocker… Very simple design & UI… The ‘glow in the dark’ clicky makes me feel all nostalgic. The downside? I feel this light is way over priced for what you are getting. I love the light. My feelings are if this light had a substantial price drop they would sell a ton of them.( Thank you JMPAUL ) Being that it runs LI batteries and not NI-MH. It has no problems with the cold . But all and all a very nice light if you can find one at the right price.

Disclaimer This review is not based on any other reviews. Any similarity is purely coincidental. Names have been changed to protect the innocent.

Good review Dale… :beer: :beer:

I like it! Nice review, Dale. How about a pic of you holding it to get an idea of it's size?

Long live the Shocker!

Good job.

Just kinda goofing off! Thought it might be fun to do a non technical review. LOL

Thanks, Dale - that thing is huge! Reminds me of the heavy duty plunger we bought for my teenage son...

LOL… Yes it does have that resemblance. Sitting beside my TK70 it looks like a plunger assortment.

Nice, easy review, Dale!

I really like the Shocker but you are right, it is way over-priced for what it is. Can't get much simpler but it sure as heck performs! $80 is about all I'd be willing to pay for one. Maybe one day they will be that inexpensive.

Id say that was a very descent review. Thanks Dale!

As for the price, it will probably dramatically drop if it remains in production. If it disappears, you just might have a very collectible light… so take good care of it.

Her thoughts were $80… I thought for profit margin the could prolly charge $100 and still make a killing… We all know they don’t have $180 worth of materials.

Thanks Dale. You hand shot really puts things in perspective.

YW… for someone with a small hand. I imagine this thing would be too big.

That’s my kind of review!

Yeah, RIC, if you’re reading this, it’s over-priced! I’ll be first in line at $100. w/free shipping.

Like to hear what the feel for the light is from a users perspective.

I still struggle with the 3 minutes on high. Too short.

The 2000 lumen mode is more than sufficient. This sucker throws a lot of light. Turbo at 3000 lumens is just showing off. Three minutes is more than enough time for beamshots & big cheesy grins. :wink:

+1 :bigsmile:

Nice! Now we just need a review for the Rayman.

That one to you :bigsmile: