so lets assume 251lm/w is the theoretical max (100CRI), in 2011 the best LEDs could only do 0.251 lumens?
even 1000x an incadescent is 17600 lm/w, meaning free energy (perpetual motion machine)
so lets say not lumens/watt but max intensity available
I’m not sure what the brightest led was in 2011, but i had an XP-E that could do over 75 lumens/watt, so 1000x means 75000 lumen output from this device. I assume that means an alternator upgrade, lets hope its compatible with my mr fusion.
I hope they drive them with high enough frequency this time. Those common 200…400Hz automotive backlights flicker to much in the corner of the eyes, very annoying . . .
True however based on the federal rules as they are now, we wont see cars with full LED equipped vehicles on the road anytime soon in North America.
In some States, daytime driving lights are still not allowed. It's a grey area and until the rules get updated to the new technology standards we're still left with old tech lighting.
i was saying that if you can’t go above 251 lm/w at 100 cri (color rendering accuracy), and if the claim of 1000x brighter then leds is accurate, then an led could not provide more then .251lm/w, which we know is incorrect, therefore the 1000x claim is garbage.
Laser lights are legal and are already in use on some models, it won’t blind anyone cause the laser light doesn’t go directly out the lens, rather it is a blu-laser reflected off of phosphor coated optics.
Actually the Merc is the first to have ALL LED lights for every light inside and out, not just headlights.
“The S-class will be the first car to use full-LED lighting. Totally rid of hot filaments, the sixth-generation S-class sedan will instead be fitted with 490 LEDs filling all lighting, signaling, and interior-illumination roles.”