Finally a runtime curve. I have used a Fenix 3200 battery for the test. Room temperature was 30º Celsius, I have used a little Fan for the test.
I can not see step down time regulated, this is very interesting, I like this option;
It is an interesting competition versus the Fenix PD35 and Nitecore P12.
My final score:
Did you use a 18650 battery to show the turbo mode on the Acebeam EC32?
I have noticed the turbo mode is much brighter using 2 RCR123/16340 batteries on the Acebeam EC32.
I ordered some Efest 18350 batteries to use in the future for better runtime.
I have used battery 18650 Fenix 3200mA for all my Acebeam EC32 test.
I have checked (one minute) with 2 CR123a primary battery, and there are about 1100 lux to one meter more than with 18650. With rcr123a , yes… probably more lumens, but I like the regulation with 18650.
I just wanted to let others know that the turbo mode is much brighter with 2 RCR123 batteries as I was wondering why turbo was not much different from high using a 18650 battery.
Perhaps with 18650 is around 950 lumens. Really, 150 or 200 lumens more (with RCR123A) is not perceived visually without equipment. For me not sense use 2xRCR123A.