I’m curious if this light has found a following here at BLF. Seems like an inexpensive way to try out a MT-G2 Light. I can’t find the link/Thread but wasn’t there a discount code floating around for this light? Thanks
I ordered one 3 weeks ago from GB, still waiting for it to arrive.
I don’t know if they are still active, but you can try this link for discounted prices: M4D M4X deals - Astrolux WP1 and WP2 LEP
I too have been considering the JM35 for quite a while.
I just checked it and the code still works today.
Single cell version for $36.26
or two cell version for $39.59
-
The thread with code is M4D M4X deals thread, (same as 1dash1 listed above) The code is in post #390: M4D M4X deals - Astrolux WP1 and WP2 LEP
M4D M4X got the code for us, if you wish you can thank him by using his links in the thread to purchase.
Direct link to post with code (comments per page set to 90): M4D M4X deals - Astrolux WP1 and WP2 LEP
-
Also I just noticed something, for a few bucks more the JM-35 (single cell version) is now stocked in USA warehouse! Price is $39.99 (discount code cannot be used in USA warehouse)
-
One of the reasons I haven’t got it yet is I needed so confirmation on a few questions and haven’t found the answers yet:
Can the one cell “upgrade” version also run on 2 cells? (this JM-30 Ext. tube also fits the JM-35)
Does the one cell version have a tail switch? (shown in the photo but not listed in the specs)
No. You’ll blow out the drivers on the one-cell version if you tried to run it at 7.4V (nominal).
And the one cell version erroneously shows a photo with a tail-switch. Every review of this flashlight that I have read states that it does not come with a tail-switch. The tail-switch is only available on the 2-cell version.
Just wondering where you got this information, could you please explain how you know this for sure?
Do you know if the 2 cell version can also run on only one cell?
By reading enough on-line reviews, all saying the same thing.
That is not so clear from the reviews that I read. All they mentioned was that the 2-cell version is not designed to operate with 1 cell. It’s not clear whether the flashlight would simply be underdriven (i.e., beam would be not so bright) or whether the Vf threshhold wouldn’t be met (i.e., beam wouldn’t turn on at all).
Anyone happen to know if the 1 or 2 Cell version can run on 18650 ?
Reference: http://m4dm4x.com/2015/06/08/review-of-shadow-jm35/
The one cell version can work with an 18650, provided you use an unprotected high drain cell.
The two cell version works with most good quality 18650 cells, protected or unprotected.
Of course, you’ll need some sort of 18650-to-26650 adapter (O-rings, toilet paper roll cut-out, etc.).
Thanks, I may give one a try
I posted this in the review thread but didn’t get a response yet so I’ll try here…
… I am glad to learn that this is a floody light. My main use will be for inline skating on dark streets so I need to light up a wide area of the road in front of me.
I am now trying to decide between the MT-H2 and XHP-50 emitter. I want the light to make hard to see obstacles like potholes and small debris immediately visible obviously. Based on the outdoor beam shots, it seems the tint on the XHP-50 makes objects stand out a bit more. Would you folks here agree?
Edit: Also, will a high current 26650 battery like the Keeppower 4200mAh (30A) make a big difference in this light? If not I will go for a higher capacity 20A battery like the Vappower 5200mAh.
mine arrived back in December. I really like the light, especially the tint and output for a small single cell light. The run time on low is impressive with a 4000mah protected 26650, i got 12 hours continuous of roughly 200 lumens of light, before it began to dim substantially. with lots of usable light for a full weekend of camping use on a single charge.
Assuming that you’re talking about the MT-G2 (5000k) and the XHP-50 (6000K) versions of the Shadow JM35, then yes, I would tend to agree with you.
My thoughts are that inline skating conditions are somewhat similar to bicycle roadway riding conditions. And my understanding from discussions with bicycle riders is that they find cool (1A) tints better for highlighting contrasts.
Any good quality 26650 cell will do fine, they pack way more punch that 18650’s. It’s only if you intend on powering the flashlight using an adapter do you need to worry about using high-drain 18650 cells.
Edited per post no. 27, below.
Did people ordering the 2-cell JM35 from banggood get the correct LED?
I’ve seen numerous reviews stating they are sending out the wrong LED’s to people.
I ordered an MT-G2 version on 11/27/15.
I received an MT-G2 version on 12/10/15.
No problemas.
Alright thanks, hope I’ll be lucky as well. Placed my order today for the MT-G2 version.
Very useful info — thanks 1dash1.
BTW, I don’t know whether these can be shipped to your location (please update your profile 
), but there’s a sale going on for Basen 26650’s, $7.80 each.
1dash1, can you elaborate on your statement of “Any good quality 26650 cell will do fine, they pack way more punch that 18650’s”?
Because I have found that there are very few 26650’s out there that can deliver higher current to an FET driven emitter, be it XM-L2 or MT-G2 or XHP-70, than the top 18650’s. Run time, yes, “punch” (translated to power) no.
2-cell light requirements don’t usually tax any cell, they’re just not typically pulling enough amps to warrant top cells in most cases. An MT-G2 direct drive on 2 cells can do about 16A, if I recall correctly. Difficult to find 26650’s that’ll do that. I know some things have been changing recently and there’s a few new players in the fat cell game, whether they meet or exceed the top dogs in the 18650 format I can’t say at this time. Maybe it’s time to do some new testing… Basen cells on the way, 4200mAh Efests in hand.
Edit: Not trying to be argumentative, just wondering if I’m missing something…