ACEBeam K40L XP-L version…Early bird, Code K40XEarly
E-coupon cannot be used - Minimun Invoice amount: US$199.95
Why XP-L???
Coupon reset ok now. Thanks
Because its superior to XM-L2. Funny many people on BLF don’t realise it yet.
Funny you don’t help people realize that.
It’s not ok: “E-coupon cannot be used - Minimun Invoice amount: US$119.95”
It’s basically XM-L2 in a smaller package.
What? Please explain, it’s an XML2 in a smaller foot print, so it can fit smaller reflectors? Hmm I have a TK61V4vn at 740kcd, how much more Superior?
As I understand it the newer XM-L2 U3 LEDs have a higher Vf and don't have the max output capability when over driven. They cap out at around 4.5A and 1300 lumens IIRC. The XP-L emitters don't have that limitation and can still be cranked to deliver 1600 or more lumens. This is what makes them the better choice in an over driven maxed out torch. ;)
Gotcha, thanks JM! Good thing I kept a bunch of the older ones! I ordered a few XPL’s to try out, good to know they can take more current! Now to order centering rings!
XP-Ls are not superior, XM-L2 U3s are bad.
A led with XM-L footprint using edge to edge die (XP-L’s technology) would be superior.
+1 Yeah! I like the way you think!!!
I agree with JohnnyMac…I have had similar experiences with the latest batch of XM-L2 U2s from Hank and Richard. Also, the latest XP-G2s seem to be the same way.
But in regards to this light, it looks pretty sweet.
Coupon is still rejected. Invoice amount too low…
Right. XP-L is the successor to XM-L2 (like XB-H is to XP-G2) and have a little more lumens from the datasheet, lose less lumens when dedome and less tint shift.
Its called the XHP50 but has higher volts requirement and multi-die.
The link in the first post pic keeps going to a page of perpetually changing computer code. Cannot access.
Hmmm...finally loaded in.
Bought one… ouch my wallet :weary: