Perhaps someone will use AI to find a way to create papers that evade whatever algorithms the cheat detection software uses… Students would undoubtedly pay for something like that
Yep, I read that they already offer an AI service for that, but it’s supposedly not very good yet at accurately detecting AI cheating.
I’ve often wondered what the purpose of writing papers is in the first place other than for technical writing or journalism majors. I studied computer science and engineering college, and I only wrote 2 papers in four years.
To qualify this, I’m an avid reader of sci fi and that has given me a great appreciation for gifted writers. It has also made me realize that I will never be a great writer no matter how much time or effort I devote to it.
I just generated some content for a document I’m working on and I have to admit to myself that it’s better than anything I could have written no matter how much time I spent on it.
I took Creative Writing in high school and college.
I got good grades and praise in those classes (and in some other English classes), so I thought I was a gifted writer, but now I realize that I'm no Stephen King. 
i don’t know if it qualifies as AI or not, but computers have ruined and taken all the fun out of chess.
It used to be fun to study games of grand masters such as Bobby Fischer, or read their books to get some insight in how they think and the strategy behind moves.
Computer chess is too perfect and boring; tournaments are held online and some are accused of using computers to cheat. What’s the point, there is no fun in that.
Does ChadGtp know anything about how to make a RANT?
Did you hear about ArgumentGPT?
Sometimes it veers into abuse.
That's when you say...

Does ChadGtp know anything about how to make a RANT?
Yes, if it’s politically correct.
I’m seeing a recurring theme where the “list things” question given to chatGPT provides answers that are essentially the same theme re-hashed.
Compare the list the machine spits out to any one of the threads about flashlight usage on here, and the list from the machine is pretty unoriginal.
One of the reasons I really enjoy forums, BLF especially, is the originality and creativity of the user’s.
Edit to add: re-reading the chatGPT answer, it doesn’t actually answer the question what is the best use, just gives a list of uses (which are variations of lighting up the dark)…
The AI is quite limited, after some rather short time you have identified the scheme. The bot gives information commonly found on the net without any depth that would add value, plus doing some censorship. Easy to see where the authors are standing politically. Completely worthless.
If the GDR would still exist, you could easily generate aktuelle kamera texts with it :).
It does seem to generate lists a lot but not always. I just asked it some questions about a medical condition one of my relatives has and it quickly gave me the info I needed, not in list form. Out of curiosity, I web searched the exact phrases in the response and no hits. Perhaps it restructures the sentences and uses some synonym lookup tables.
Using it to generate things to post on BLF (aside from the example I put above) would certainly be a waste of my time and everyone else’s ![]()
if an AI were created with engineering capabilities that matched or surpassed those of its human creators, it would have the potential to autonomously improve its own software and hardware to design an even more capable machine, which could repeat the process in turn. This recursive self-improvement could accelerate, potentially allowing enormous qualitative change before any upper limits imposed by the laws of physics or theoretical computation set in
This looks incredibly intriguing and I know absolutely nothing about it. Now I have to venture off and get educated. It’s interesting how I come to BLF for information about flashlights and so often, I come away with much more than I had expected. Once again, thanks for the heads-up. :+1:
:+1: ![]()
Ha I asked it to rewrite what you just wrote:
“ “This appears extremely captivating and I am completely unaware of it. I must now go and expand my knowledge. It’s fascinating how I come to BLF seeking information about flashlights and often leave with more than I anticipated. Again, thank you for the heads-up.”
Google Unveils Its ChatGPT Rival…
I think the art generation part is a bit of a grift. I saw a clip where someone fed it prompts to try and have it generate art of the internet personality XQC. The result was XQCish, no doubt, but I immediately recognized the hair. It looked like it was ripped straight off of Elsa from Frozen, probably a fanart. That’s not creativity, that’s throwing a bunch of human-produced art into a blender and spitting out Franksteined art. No wonder artists are getting pissed off.
Linus Tech Tips did a piece on it. One of their findings was it will confidently be wrong. Still an amazing tool.
This looks incredibly intriguing and I know absolutely nothing about it. Now I have to venture off and get educated. It’s interesting how I come to BLF for information about flashlights and so often, I come away with much more than I had expected. Once again, thanks for the heads-up. :+1:
Ha I asked it to rewrite what you just wrote:
“ “This appears extremely captivating and I am completely unaware of it. I must now go and expand my knowledge. It’s fascinating how I come to BLF seeking information about flashlights and often leave with more than I anticipated. Again, thank you for the heads-up.”
:+1: Hmmmm……… interesting. BUT, I do prefer Bushmaster’s version :student: ![]()
Google Unveils Its ChatGPT Rival…
Wow nice. I was able to write a little powershell script to “converse” with ChatGPT. Some people have found ways to hack it to make it churn out profanity.
I think Bard is a stupid name by the way. I bet Google paid hundreds of people millions of dollars to come up with that. How about:
- Google Overmind
- Google Universe
- Google Wisdom
- Google Odin (the god of wisdom, poetry, and magic)
- Omega
- Prime
a. i can;t even register - ’’we are too busy at the moment”.
b. when i get that far, it doesn’t like yahoo email addresses [but doesn;t tell you why it doesn;t work either]
c. now i just found out it won;t like ‘burner phone numbers’
d. i have not seen anything yet that looks like you could trust it - you have to do all the verification work yourself anyway
a. i can;t even register - ’’we are too busy at the moment”.
b. when i get that far, it doesn’t like yahoo email addresses [but doesn;t tell you why it doesn;t work either]
c. now i just found out it won;t like ‘burner phone numbers’
d. i have not seen anything yet that looks like you could trust it - you have to do all the verification work yourself anyway
Yeah, I tried using burner numbers and a Google Voice number, but finally relented and used my real phone number.