31

Which one? Not an easy question, because it’s hard for me to make that choice without seeing the same in daylight. The leave looks unnaturally red to me, but then I know some leaves can have a very bright color.
The pole in the background on the 170N looks brighter. Why is that? Has it reflective material on it. The 170N leaves look far more blurred than the 325 leaves. Is that because the camera has trouble with almost half the brightness?

For me, Nichia was a synonym for high CRI. Yuji scores even better. If blue could be ‘fixed’ it will be very close to daylight. Is the difference really visible in real life? I guess the answer is something like “depends on which color you are looking at”.

I must admit I don’t fully understand the graphs. It would be my guess that if all colors bars are equally high the light would be CRI-100.
If so I would expect that all lights have at least one bar being exactly 100. For the Olight that would be R14/green. In other words I would expect relative values in the graphs, but they seem to be absolute values.

Back to reading tags again. If the tag would be the leaves and the letters that red leave then then high CRI would make the tage more readable because the red jumps out more.
I wonder if low cri in some situations (colors) increases contrast. For example I’ve read that blue lights, really blue not just blueish, are best for map reading. Likely because black lines pop out?
Or hunters following a blood trail best use blue or ultraviolet. That while from looking at the picture with the leaves more red would highlight red/blood.

Let’s say for whatever weird reason I want to read a book (just text no pictures) in pitch dark. I only have a small flashlight. Would high cree best for this situation?
Now assume the book has white paper and R14/green letters. Would the Olight give the best readability because it peaks at R14/green? Or would it just turn the whole book green?

I’ll stop (for) now, because I might have started over-analyzing again :slight_smile: