Lexel
(Lexel)
27
Why do you quote a buck driver unseen inefficient?
Burning overhead voltage in FET or with DD with no bypasses, high iR cell and thin wires has ecxactly the same result on efficiency
a 90-92% efficient buck driver with properly bypassed springs and high drain cells should be not less efficient than any other driver concept
you mainly burn overhead voltage on this LED from 3.3V to about 3.8-3.9V on battery
simply do an efficiency calculation on this and you will see how inefficient your DD gets
so lets do the math for you I get to 86% efficiency with full cell with 3.3V LED and 3.85V from battery
with lower cell voltage and less current that efficiency goes up, but also on a buck driver on medium currents this is the case
but if we start too look into your medium modes with full cell
DD is PWMed while CC Buck driver gains extra efficiency as it does not drive the LED on full current, so the losses in the wiring are reduced and the LED runs more efficient
as a summary often in medium moded and full current the Buck driver beats any DD driver,
the only advantage has DD+7135 at very low moon modes where its naturally more efficient as no buck controller has to be used which got some static losses which do not decrease with current