I live in northern Britain amongst open countryside, amongst which I enjoy walking my two dogs. At this time of year it goes dark at around 4.00 PM so fitting-in an afternoon walk can prove problematic. On a recent shopping trip I spotted some LED headlights for sale at the knock down price of £1.49p. I purchased one of these, without remotely appreciating that I had just opened a Pandora's box...
That night I fitted the light with 3xAAA batteries and set off with the dogs after dark to test out my new purchase. The light had the option of 4 LEDs, 8 LEDs, 12 LEDS and Strobe. Zinc carbon batteries begin to fade after around 2 hours on high, and alkalines after 6-7 hours. It produced a floody bluish glow ahead of me as opposed to throwing a hotspot or beam. I felt that 4 LEDs was just about tolerable, 8 LEDs sufficient, and 12 LEDs fairly useful for the large part of my walk. It did however feel a little less than perfect at a point where I follow a wooded trail alongside a river and I tripped over a couple of tree roots. The following night I also took a 8 LED torch to help me through that stretch. This got me thinking that if the light had 20 LEDs, then it would probably be perfect. That took me to ebay, where I bought the following two lights...
Both of these behaved like my first light, albeit with a slightly higher output on high, due to their having 23 LEDs. Whilst these lights look the same as the one above, all three have their subtle differences. They are constructed and hinged differently, the straps differ in quality, and they are moulded out of differing materials. The left hand one leaked light like crazy from beneath, because the lens' screw-cap didn't correctly fit the body (I blocked this with nail lacquer). The right hand one was completely unusable because of the overwhelming Chinese rubber/plastic smell, which turns my stomach. Despite the improved light levels, I still wanted more; hence I then went and bought one of these...
This was advertised as having a Cree Q3 LED, and the emitter certainly looks the same as an XP-E/XR-E. The light was much brighter than my previous purchases, but instead of producing an even luminance ahead of me, I had the choice of highly annoying multiple rings of Saturn on wide angle, or a useless hotspot on zoom. I then took the decision to try it without the lens, and it was completely transformed into a really useful light. I have now replaced the lens with a disc of PET plastic cut from a lemonade/soda bottle and a rubber O ring. With the head tilted slightly downwards this evenly illuminates a 12-15ft circle ahead of me, which I find perfect (I can zoom it to shrink the circle but without the lens this makes no difference to the intensity). For the most part I am more than happy with the light on wide angle and set on low, which to my mind kinda replicates the light of a full moon. When I come to the riverside wooded footpath, I switch it over to high, which is more than enough to make me feel sure-footed. The only problem with this light was that on full power it would begin to fade after 45 minutes with zinc carbon batteries, and 90 mins with rechargeable Uniross 1000 mAh NiMHs (I've not yet tried it with alkalines). My walk takes around 75 minutes, and I'm usually on low power, so I could easily manage with this. However, I had by now learned about 18650 batteries, hence I went and bought this outfit...
This was advertised as having a Cree Q5 LED, and again, the emitter does appear to be an XP-E/XR-E. I immediately replaced this light's horrible lens with a disc of PET and O ring, after which I felt that the output from this light was virtually identical to the green light above. A photographer's incident light meter held at 3" from either light on full power indicates 12 EV. This light pulls 600 mA on high and 160 mA on low and when the same battery was hooked via test leads to the green light above, that pulled 470mA and 180mA on low. I have used the light over the last 4 nights and the battery is holding up well. For the most part I am content to leave the light on its lower setting, but again the high setting comes in useful when things become tricky underfoot.
This light's main problem is that the hinge is loosely riveted, which causes the head to fall downwards as opposed to maintaining the forward/downward angle that I desire. I have overcome this by setting my desired angle and filling the resulting gap with silicon sealant to glue it in place. Crude, but effective.The head-strap just about fits my medium sized head and could be too tight for some people.
Finally, having read reports on here about the Ultrafire headlights, I felt obliged to go out and buy one of these...
It was easy to see why this light has its fans, despite the price. It is well constructed and simple. The light it produces is virtually identical the two above (after I had removed their lenses). The exposure meter gives an identical 12 EV, and the Q5 emitter pulls 630mA on high. It took me 2 days to figure out how to turn down the power (press the clicky hard as if to switch off, but then hold instead of releasing). I found that I needed to remove the clip in order to attain my desired forward/downward angle with the headband. Despite its merits, to my mind this light does have a couple of drawbacks, which make it less suited to my purpose than the one above it ( I have since changed my mind about these). Although it is not heavy, its forward weighting and lack of overhead strap, combine to make it wobble as I walk I then become highly aware that the beams periphery is bouncing all over the place, and I find this very off-putting. My second grumble is with that adjusting the light's intensity is a much slower process than simply clicking the switch, as per the two lights above it. I suspect therefore, that this light will become my preferred light for other outdoor activities, but for dog walking purposes I shall be sticking to the black one with rear mounted 18650 battery.
Update: Please note that I have added a couple of updates regarding my experiences below.