Hopefully the educated ones give proper credit this time while appropriating this thought, as there has been elementary toe-dipping into the subject already.
What are the supersaturation and critical points of light? I would imagine it to be some integral of boyle’s ideal gas law.
What do you mean by supersaturation (what are the analogues of solvent and solute) and critical point (what is the analogue of phase change)?
How much energy does it take to displace unactivated light, and what happens when you do? It’s a theory of some sort, based on einstein’s e=mc². Energy doesn’t come from nowhere, and the one thing many of these equations have in common is light as a constant. Without energy, there can be no mass. I’ve hypothesized that mass is actually some function of light, and anything with negative mass would exhibit the same gravitation as its positive counterpart, except instead of material mass, it would be an immaterial…a.k.a. a literal hole.
And if this all sounds familiar, yes, I’m the same kook that presented this idea with all the people dismissing me or telling me i’m wrong because it’s not what they were taught or it is something they hadn’t read.
Frequency vs amplitude, at what point does EM substrate unravel or decompose? As for the critical state, can we disrupt the laminar flow of time? Can we “create” matter?
What sort of gases have you been inhaling recently? 
Unless your question is about light passing through different gases I fail to see any connection.
Maybe rephrase your question.
Never mind you have too many questions already.
Displace unactivated light???
Are you asking how much energy is lost as light passes through an unlit area/medium?
If we were to rip out whatever medium EM waves travel along. Light itself is a medium, we merely observe the “EM spectrum” as different frequencies along that medium. Kind of like how coherent sounds are a certain frequency, then ultralow frequencies outside our hearing, as well as ultrahigh. Considering that space is a material vacuum, it might stand to reason that it’s actually an immaterial, or supercedes the physical.
Simple really;
The Angle of the Dangle
Heat of the Meat
I think you need to define what space you’re talking about.
There are tiny amounts of gas and occasional dust particles and radiation and light in space. Maybe once you get out of our solar system there is less and less of this. I suspect that if you were standing on the dark side of the Moon there would be enough light from the Stars to see the ground the same way you can here on Earth on a moonless night when the stars are nice and bright. Although some humans probably live in areas where they’ve never experienced that because they are too close to city lights.
The most rarefied, least physically occupied regions of space, no matter how small. In that “space”, there is still EM radiation going through it, just no physical matter to occupy it or interact with the waves. And I dunno if you’ve ever thought about this, but the physical manifestation of light does NOT occupy the same place that matter does, but it can pass between the gaps OR impart energy to the matter it hits.
Yes I think everybody on Earth is aware that on cloudy days or extremely heavy downpours the amount of light coming through from the Sun can be dramatically reduced. The same with foggy, misty , rain, snow, dust, ash /smoke and other things affect sunlight and man-made lights.
Maybe not everybody is thinking about the mechanism of this phenomenon.
Is there light in the blackness of space?
(P.S…If you say anything other than yes, then you’re wrong.)
**how many different frequencies of EM (light) can occupy any given point at any given time, and at what amplitude?
Just because it looks black from where we are standing/ looking doesn’t mean it would look or be black if we were standing or floating in that black location.
You can’t escape light no matter where you go because there are stars in every direction.
What we refer to as black holes are probably just magnetic aberrations from one body pulling or having pulled another away from our vantage point. Sort of a temporary vortex or extreme vacuum. Not temporary on our clock or calendar.
I may have to send that theory into Neil.
I already sent Neil a theory on black holes being displaced “aether”. There’s a reason the C is squared in E=mc², total energy over light folded in on itself becomes mass. I also have a theory that gravity is a stretched spandex, or “aether” where mass instantaneously appeared. The reason gravity is stronger on an object is because of the density of the “aether” around it, and more massive objects are displacing more aether, like the archimedian principle. Imagine a massive guy suddenly appearing at a point to generate gravity proportional to his mass. Gravity is the same anywhere on the surface of the contiguous object, the variables of weight being air pressure, centripetal force, and friction.
In short, all the essence of matter and energy should roughly equate to the apparent mass of all the black holes. It’s literal spacetime (time) being carved out, and teleported to more time to create matter and energy.
**addendum, the entropic state of a black hole would be completeness, and the entropic state of mass is equilibrium. With a black hole, the amount of mass fed into gets rendered back into its base constituent parts, a.k.a. Light and aether. Gravitation is just a result of an entropic existence