Review: GearBest - Kinfire K40x (4x XML2, 1 - 4x 18650)

Kinfire K40X

Reviewer's Overall Rating: ★★★☆☆

Summary:

Battery: 4 x 18650
Switch: Electronic side switch
Modes: 3: High, Low + hidden strobe
LED Type: 4 x XM-L2 (Cool White)
Lens: Glass
Tailstands: Yes
Price: $43.63 Shipped
Provided by: GearBest for review
Product Link: http://www.gearbest.com/led-flashlights/pp_5508.html

Pros:

A bit more compact compared to my SRK sample.

Versatility in Battery options (1 - 4)

Very bright, I would estimate around 2500lm.

XML2 emitters, cool white.

Great Run-time with 4x 18650 in parallel.

Electronic side switch with hidden strobe.

Exterior/machining/thread quality is good.

The extra machining work makes it more comfortable in your hand.

Cons:

No substantial heatsinking, just a thin quad-LED MCPCB/star resting on a small ledge. More on this later.

Defect in one of the reflector wells.

Very tiny wires utilized (Could be a good thing considering the lack of heatsinking)

Incompatible with flat top batteries (Laptop pulls need solder mound added to positive terminal)

Slight audible whine in Low mode.

Longer protected batteries are a very tight squeeze, so much so that I would only recommend using flattop cells.

Positive terminal of batteries rub against the driver contact board when tightening the battery tube (This could be an issue in the long run, and is a much greater issue in the K40X vs my SRK)... more on this later.

A bit on the heavy side loaded with 4x 18650.

Came bundled with 4x Kinfire BRC 1500mAh cells, all measuring below 1v. Didn't bother taking the risk to charge them.

Incorrect specifications:

The glass lens does not have AR coating.

The Flashlight received is Silver, but listed as brown, black, or gold (I like the silver, but requested brown).

The throw is not 300-400m, reasonable estimate would be a usable brightness around 75-100 yards.

Pictures:

Open any image to view full resolution!

This box arrived in a reasonably padded bubble mailer.


Inside the box, loose accessories. :(


Here are the contents of the box. The cells measured less than 1v each. I decided it was not worth the risk to attempt to charge them, even in a controlled safe area.


Despite the packaging, the light arrived unharmed.

The bezel is aluminum, poorly coated. The inner area of the bezel has splash marks and some slight machining marks. They can be seen better in the emitter picture.

Here are the 4 beautiful XML2 emitters. A few are slightly off center, this doesn't seem to effect the beam pattern in a noticeable way.

You can see the machining marks and coating defect on top of the bezel.

Size Comparison:

From left to right: K40X, SRK, Solarforce L2, Tangsfire C8


Comparison with SRK:

(Kinfire is always on the left, SRK is always on the right)

Tailstand

Headstand

A peek at the bottoms

Emitters (XML2 in the kinfire, XML in the SRK)

One of the big differences is the battery tube length.

This reduced length in the Kinfire K40X causes a problem with longer (protected) cells.

Cells from left to right in the Kinfire battery tube: 2x Laptop pull w/ brass nut, laptop pull with small solder mound, Panasonic protected NCR18650B 3400mAh

(This mix and match cell configuration is for visual demonstration purposes only... DO NOT mix and match cells for usage)

View from above

Cells from left to right in the Kinfire battery tube: 2x Laptop pull w/ brass nut, laptop pull with small solder mound, Panasonic protected NCR18650B 3400mAh

(This mix and match cell configuration is for visual demonstration purposes only... DO NOT mix and match cells for usage)

The picture below is regular use, laptop-pull cells.

Disassembly:

Top of the battery tube threads. Nice, Smooth and lubricated.

Bottom of the battery tube, 2 of the screw holes are bare and not drilled.

Underside of the head, backside of the driver.

Plain glass lens, aluminum bezel, switch retainer, switch button, thick O-ring, aluminum reflector.

Small defect in the reflector (Upper left hand well)

Quad emittter MCPCB

Nothing underneath.

A look at the driver and the extremely thin wires.

Conclusion:

Based on preliminary beamshots I would rate the Kinfire K40X at 3/5. The major deductions mostly come from the lack of heatsinking, less than optimal driver, and the short battery tube. It does still output a decent amount of light, but the lack of heatsinking is going to be a problem if one wanted to mod and could be problematic for the LEDs in the long run.

Beams:

Mouse Out is Kinfire K40X (4 xml2).

Mouse Over is SRK (3 xml).

Low:

High:

Nice review unknown00101. Its a shame about the shortcomings where with a little thought this could of been a terrific light.

Looks pretty good. But no pill.. ..what were they thinking?

Thanks for the review! :)

Thanks for the review, it seems a ok light that is built sub-optimal, too expensive for me to want it though.

Same as ever with budget lights: they were not thinking, and we know better, it would not be so much fun if it was the other way around :-)

Nice looking little powerhouse. Thanks for this.

great review and thanks

Thanks guys. It’s still an okay light as-is, but there’s probably little to no upgrading that can be done without a pretty substantial amount of work to improve heat sinking.

It has become my go-to light for the next few weeks to see how everything holds up to the moderate drive current and lengthy run times.

Update:

Beams are up. My stock SRK 3xml moderately driven at 4.5A just slightly edges out the K40X in throw. The K40X has a pretty similar hotspot with a bit more spill and a cleaner beam. The Kinfire’s xml2 emitter have a very clean ‘pure white’ tint whereas the SRK has a slightly blueish tint.

I’ve just been informed that GearBest is offering the following coupon for the Kinfire K40X.

Coupon Code: GBTORCH
Discount Price: $42.99

http://www.gearbest.com/led-flashlights/pp_5508.html

Lots of broken image links there. But it looks like a nice light. I’m thinking that one of those round [star shaped] heatsinks fasttech sells, ground down, could work in conjunction with a copper disk. Or perhaps creating a copper disk just slightly small enough to slip in the body underneath the star-plate, and then using a thermal epoxy to glue it into the light? Thermal transfer wouldn’t be ideal, but you’d still have lots of transfer contact, even if it was throuhg thermal glue.

Weird, what browser are you running?

I checked Firefox and chrome on PC and both laptops as well as safari on my phone.

That is probably the easiest way to do it. There is a second lip under the lip that the mcpcb rests on. A 2-4mm thick disk could be fit in there for a decent amount of heat transfer. If press fit it would be a very nice upgrade.