I must apologize to you and to Jenna Zhang for the original link to my German counterpart-review for the KL52 Plus on TLF that had to be removed again by myself. :FACEPALM:

I had promised to and I felt obliged to release a German review on TLF, too. I want to explain why if anyone was wondering what happened:

After I completed and published my review there, the TLF admin team decided to reject/not publish it for reasons of legal concerns about the picatinny rail mount. They told me it even violates against the weapons law in Germany to possess this picatinny rail mount in combination with the flashlight. As far as I have informed myself about it, this is not true as the picatinny rail mount is not solely intended to be used on rifles but also for non-military applications like on helmets, bikes, softgun/airgun etc..

The only scenario that causes law enforcement to become alerted and that truly violates against the law is to mount the KL52 with the picatinny rail mount onto a rifle. Picatinny rail mounts can be bought without any restrictions everywhere in Germany as they are known to be universal mounts, approved to be sold with a minimum age of 14 years. For instance, here's a another eBay link to a German retailer that legally sells flashlights with picatinny railmounts:

If the TLF admin team's opinion was proven right, even Amazon would violate against German law as they offer Odepro's and Brinyte's flashlights with this mount on their German marketplace platform.

A simple notice like "Attention: It is strictly forbidden to use the KL52 mounted onto a rifle in Germany" at the beginning of my review - amended by the admin team - would have sufficed in my opinion but their approach was to have me cut out any information about the picatinny rail mount in order to release my review to the public. I hope for your understanding that I am unwilling to comply and rather prefer to have them deleted the entire review. Please excuse the ranting about my discontent...

Cheers,

Thomas