According to the archive.org copy of the page from July, it was 25 degrees.

However, that might not give a very clear understanding of the comparative beam angle, as the real beam varies depending on the apparent optical size of the emitter, so it depends on what optical size was assumed for the 25 degree spec.

But, I think it’s likely this will be at least slightly throwier than the original based on what has been stated so far, and on the range of beam profiles Carclo achieves with similar size optics.