I need some adult supervision here. I figured the white SFT42R has the 5050 pad and the driver delivers some 10 A (at some 3.5 V) on max and ~2 A after stepdown.
The SST08UV-H seems to be using 3535 pad and I imagine not more than 1 A on max.
Both. I was hoping for something with lower CCT and nicer tint but still somewhat throwy (SFT40 5000 or 3000K, or XHP50.3 maybe?) for white and something floody with high CRI (519a ?) for the UV but I’m not sure what could work well (or at all).
I’ve tried SFT40 5000K and it turns blue and won’t replace the SFT42R. I doubt the 3000K would fare better; I would wait for the SFT42R 5000K.
Replacing UV with 519A should be ok, the Vf difference between UV and white LED is on the same order as the Vf difference of the same white LED on different levels; I trust that the driver can handle this just fine.
Since battery’s voltage drops below emitter’s Vf quite quickly you can’t judge by this runtime graph alone.
You could run the test in low mode. If low mode is unregulated then high mode is 100% also. If it’s regulated - unfortunately that would give no clue about high mode, I think.
But that’s just my assumptions.
I’m sure you will. 2p battery pack can provide high enough current without voltage sag.
In koef3’s test 519a reached 8 amps under just 3.5volts. Applying 4 volts would be an instaburn I guess.