HydrAxx
(HydrAxx)
18
Just look at the negative poles of the two cells you are comparing; the one that HKJ tests in this thread is a cell manufactured by YongdeLi (Chinese manufacturer) that has official specifications 3750mAh this rated capacity and 40 amps of continuous discharge (30 amps actually in the tests, otherwise you could boil the water with, lol ) and its negative pole is flat and without asperity or engraving, as for the cell “Turmera” that you present us, its specifications are false, why? Just look at the inscriptions on his blue wrap, we can read from the side under the label of authenticity, part of the inscription: “70SA”. We would read “LS LR2170SA” if this damn label does not interfere with the reading, which means that this cell is manufactured by Tianjin Lishen (Chinese manufacturer also) and its true specifications are 4000mAh and 12 amps of continuous discharge (but it can be mounted easily at 20 amps without overheating (<80 ° c), only the life of the cell will be reduced if we exceed the 12 amps continuous starting) and more negative pole of this cell has a circular engraving which serves to bottom venting or degassing if you want. To prove to you all that I advance in my remarks I put you technical links for these two cell models.
The cell used by HKJ in his test:
-Link to official specifications on YongdeLi’s official website:
http://www.ydlxny.com/index.php/work1/show/25.html
-Link to an example of rewrap from this cell (by Vapcell):
The cell used by Turmera that you presented to us:
-Link to product sheet (commercial) with official wrap and official specifications:
https://www.18650batterystore.com/21700-p/lishen-lr2170sa.htm
In addition the photos that you will see on the page of the last link (Lishen LR2170SA) proves to you by comparing the two wraps (that of your cell and the Lishen) are the same (same colors, same inscriptions and presence of the circular engraving of degassing on the negative pole), here I can not do better to prove my good faith, lol.