Mak 1000W (1500W) https://image.made-in-china.com/2f0j10sAmtkJHBLQcT/Mac-Latest-100mm-110mm-Front-M.jpg

Elements Shockli IMR26650 5500mAh-black is disguised elements from PLB INR26650-55A? Did the Shockli IMR26650 5250mAh-green, this also the original disguised from PLB (50A-5000mAh), or did this 5250-version of Shockli take it from another manufacturer?

Of course, Golisi 4300mAh-Gold will lose in terms of mAh and, accordingly, the maximum distance covered during the trip. But, according to the results and graphs of HKJ, they behave quite steadily at high load currents compared to the absolute majority of batteries from other manufacturers.
However now when you introduced us to the manufacturer of PLB, I lack the graphic data of bit characteristics from our famous researcher in the world of autonomous power sources - HKJ. I became interested in these PLBs (I liked the discharge curves of version 50A-5000mAh more), but where are the PLB-50A and PLB-55A results in the HKJ tables, which will allow to compare their characteristics with all other participants and direct competitors? If PLB-50A \ 55-A are so good, then why the PLB manufacturer itself is not interested in providing its elements to the well-known HKJ for the sake of its own benefit and successful promotion of its unfamiliar elements in the market. Yes, PLB maker has already shown us its own discharge graphs. But, why are they so small and poorly distinguishable for review and comparison? Why are pictures so dull and uninformative that are so important for making a purchase decision?
https://www.powerlongbattery.com/Content/ue/net/upload1/Other/31531/6360980322031489824761548.jpg
https://www.powerlongbattery.com/Content/ue/net/upload1/Other/31531/6360981837394597488448928.jpg

I also like the form factor 21700, so for now it’s hard to decide what to bet on - 3P-26650 or 4P-21700. 18650 I don’t want to consider at all, because I think that for high currents they are, all the same, too thin. The thing is, that batteries with their internal resistance are not ordinary passive resistors with their own rules about resistance. Elements are active chemical reactors with their own character for each, so you should not look at them just as we do according to the usual rules for resistors. Therefore, it is better to have a smaller number of large elements in each bank than a large number of small elements.

Well, let it be INR or with some other designation, but for me and for many other people it will be even better if we can evaluate their bit characteristics in the most convenient and competent HKJ-tables ( ͡ᵔ ͜ʖ ͡ᵔ)